Opinion

Med school ethics in question

Subhead: 
The University has work to do to ensure a clean ethical record.
Advertisement

BY
PUBLISHED: 06/18/2008

Last week the Daily reported on the state of ethics at the University's medical school, and what it found was disappointing. Citing the American Medical Student Association's 2008 PharmFree scorecard, the school received a "D" owing to the inadequacy of policies addressing "gifts, education, and student/faculty interaction with industry representatives ."

A similar report issued by the American Association of Medical Colleges Task Force on Industry Funding of Medical Education recommended the establishment of "effective and principled" partnerships by prohibiting faculty and students from receiving gifts from industry representatives . Now that these recommendations are known, the question is not if the University ought to follow them, but will it?

The most likely reason that the University would not change policy is the most obvious one: money. Between the shrinking pool of research dollars available from the National Institutes of Health a nd the appeal of additional personal revenue, so-called "consulting fees" and "study payments" become appealing alternatives. With the University's hunger to be a top-flight research institution, this may seem to be yet another means to that end. But perpetuating or ignoring conflict of interest in the medical school is absolutely unacceptable. Conflicts of interest gave rise to the pharmaceutical disaster of Vioxx, and have recently come around again in the investigations of drugs like Zyprexa and Avandia. It cannot be in the best interest of the University to cultivate a reputation of training and employing physicians who take industry kickbacks and produce dubious, industry-manipulated research.

Fortunately, we are not at that point yet. The 2008 AMSA report is only the second one of its kind, and the conclusions reached by the AAMC task force are a new development as well. Although forswearing industry benefits will be a difficult habit to break, it will not be disadvantageous. There are already eight schools, including UPenn and UCLA (the third and ninth best medical research institutions according to U.S. News and World Report), that have earned an "A" from AMSA. Our medical school has the power to make the grade as well. We challenge the University to do just that.

1 Comment

The Minnesota Daily wants to host a forum for discussion regarding issues and stories regarding the University of Minnesota and surrounding communities. However, the online comments should not be used to threaten or defame. This is a place for people to be heard, and want to contribute to discussion. Those who persist to use expletives, inappropriate, racist, defamatory or abusive postings risk losing the privilege to post.

To flag an inappropriate comment please login.

medical ethics

I would love to tell you what happened to me here in Grand Island, Nebraska and at Mayo Clinic of Rochester, Minnesota in 2001/2002. Years ago, a nurse who worked for a Urologist told me that whenever the Urologist would get the chance, he would go up into the kidney and scratch it to form a kidney stone in the same way that an oyster forms a pearl. I remember asking the nurse how it was that a doctor could cut a patient and the patient not know it from the pain and the bleeding. I don't recall what she said, but I now know how it's done.
My name is Mike McDermott
1603 Gretchen Avenue
Grand Island, Nebraska 68803
308-384-5043

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <b> <i> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
Are you human?
Image CAPTCHA
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.