Campus

U moves up 10 spots in U.S. News rankings

Advertisement

BY David Introwitz
PUBLISHED: 09/03/2008

The University moved up 10 places to 61st on this year’s U.S. News & World Report rankings of the country’s top schools.

The University was ranked out of more than 130 top schools . It also placed 22nd on the public schools list .

The list, which hit newsstands Aug. 26, compared academic standards such as peer assessment, retention and student selectivity.

The standards were then weighted according to the judgment of the U.S. News editorial board to create the rankings.

Despite the increase, many University faculty and students still aren’t impressed with the rankings.

“You’d be hard pressed to find any college who took these rankings very seriously,” said Sharon Reich Paulsen , associate vice president of academic affairs and provost . “It’s really a commercial endeavor designed to sell magazines.”

In addition to ranking public universities and liberal arts colleges, U.S. News also ranked business and engineering programs.

Carlson School of Management Dean Alison Davis-Blake criticized the methods used to obtain rankings for business schools.

The business school rankings are created by peer surveys, but they only ask about a school’s perceived reputation on a scale of one to five, Davis-Blake said.

“They’re not going in and measuring what they’re actually doing,” she said.

Still, the rankings can play a role in whether students pick one school over another.

Seena Patel , an international business and entrepreneurial management senior, said the University was her first choice, and that business school rankings were a large factor in her decision to come to the Carlson School.

Some students, however, weighed other factors more heavily than rankings.

Dan Richter , a global studies junior, and K.C. Huchendorf , an operations management and marketing junior, said they decided to attend the University because of recommendations from friends, the University’s policy on Advanced Placement classes and tuition costs — not how it was ranked.

“Most universities are about the same,” Richter said.

Robert Morse, director of data research at U.S. News and developer of the ranking system, said that although people criticize the rankings, schools do take them seriously and use them for advertisements and fundraising.

The University has posted a goal of becoming a top-three research institution in the next 10 years, manifested in the Driven to Discover campaign .

“Our main goal is to provide prospective students, their parents and the general public about the relative information of public universities,” Morse said. “Institutions are using them as goals. They’re using it as a yardstick to validate or show their policies and how they’re running their institution and whether they’re succeeding.”

The only other Minnesota university on the list was the University of St. Thomas , which placed as a third-tier school.

Six Minnesota colleges were ranked in the top-100 liberal arts colleges — Carleton , Macalester and St. Olaf colleges placed 8th, 25th and 47th, respectively.

For its Best Colleges 2009 guide, U.S. News & World Report gathered information from 1,400 colleges.

The University was also ranked 524th out of 569 schools in a recent survey of top colleges by Forbes, which used some different criteria, including noteworthiness of professors, student evaluations, graduation rates and student debt.

2 Comments

The Minnesota Daily wants to host a forum for discussion regarding issues and stories regarding the University of Minnesota and surrounding communities. However, the online comments should not be used to threaten or defame. This is a place for people to be heard, and want to contribute to discussion. Those who persist to use expletives, inappropriate, racist, defamatory or abusive postings risk losing the privilege to post.

To flag an inappropriate comment please login.

Rankings

For a slightly different spin on these rankings, please see:

http://blog.lib.umn.edu/bgleason/pt/2008/08/americas_best_colleges_2008_...

and

http://blog.lib.umn.edu/bgleason/pt/2008/08/us_news_rankings_209_nationa...

If rankings don't mean anything, then how will we ever know if we have attained the "ambitious aspiration of being one of the top three research universities in the world?

And if they don't mean anything why does the office of the provost have a listing of some of them, admittedly out of date?

http://academic.umn.edu/provost/reports/rankings.html

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <b> <i> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
Are you human?
Image CAPTCHA
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.