BY Andrew Post
PUBLISHED: 09/08/2008
At a time when 47 million Americans are uninsured, health care has arguably become the most important issue to voters across the country. John McCain has announced his proposal for giving more citizens access to health care, but it’s clear that no candidate will be able to offer a quick fix to this massive problem. Both candidates have similarities in their plans, but McCain’s encourages individual responsibility and free-market solutions while Barack Obama’s raises taxes and extends the long arm of government into small businesses where it doesn’t belong.
McCain’s plan calls for several changes to the current system. First, a change in rules regarding health insurance providers will make health insurance itself more affordable. McCain’s plan would allow citizens to purchase plans across state lines, which is currently prohibited. This allows consumers much more choice in the open and competitive market, where prices are subject to more scrutiny and evaluation. Additionally, McCain would make insurance plans portable from job to job, which is where many people lose coverage. The average American could have 10-15 different jobs before they turn 30, which means transferable health coverage is a must. McCain would also introduce new regulations requiring providers to offer more coverage to those with conditions that usually disqualify them for coverage.
More must be done in the hospitals as well to keep costs under control. A primary change that is long overdue is the limiting of liability for doctors that follow medical guidelines and procedures. There must be a cap on the amount a patient can sue because thousands of good doctors — including those that deliver newborns — have been put into bankruptcy by greedy trial lawyers. While patients deserve the right to fair compensation, these frivolous lawsuits have forced doctors to pass high premiums that protect them on to consumers. Obama offers no mention of this in his plan.
Emergency room visits are the most expensive of all forms of treatment, so limiting what can and what cannot be covered during a visit to the emergency room is a practical way to control costs. McCain supports the idea of sponsoring the building of more quick clinics in high traffic areas to keep people with treatable and minuscule illnesses out of the emergency room.
McCain would create a national database that rates performance of hospitals in all areas of health care, giving consumers information so they can choose their own doctor.
Federal action is part of McCain’s plan to provide further access to health care. As president, he would offer a $2,500 tax credit to individuals to pay for coverage, and if they didn’t use it, the coverage could go into a personal health savings account, allowing individuals to take charge of their own care. There would also be increased funding for covering those low-income citizens that qualify, and new incentives for states to provide pools to insure those that are traditionally uninsurable.
McCain would allow more safe drugs to be imported from outside the United States in order to give consumers more choice, and also support streamlining the time it takes for cheaper generic drugs to hit the market.
McCain would begin a much larger, nationally funded effort to reduce and prevent chronic diseases and behaviors like asthma, diabetes, obesity and smoking, which lead to 75 percent of all money spent on health care in the United States. These chronic, yet preventable diseases have lead to higher costs for everyone.
Technology can also be a huge influence in reducing health costs across the board. New medical record keeping systems would allow patient data to be transferred, doctors to move around, and lower administrative overhead costs. Both candidates tend to agree on more funding for better information technology systems to improve care quality.
There are a few problems with Obama’s plan that would put a further burden on some Americans. Obama would create new mandates on businesses which his campaign admits would cost up to $65 billion in new money. He would pay for them by raising taxes. Obama wants to force insurance providers to accept all applications they receive, and then charge about the same premiums for all customers. To put it another way, a 65-year-old obese man that smokes would pay about as much as a healthy young person, because cost disparity is unfair in his world. Small businesses would be forced to cover some or all of their employees’ health plans or be charged a fine. In order to supervise the millions of small businesses that exist, billions would have to be spent on new ways to monitor all of them for compliance.
Although Obama has claimed that his plan is not “universal health care” similar to Canada’s health-care system, he has supported such legislation in the Senate. Because this style of coverage is so unpopular, however, he has been forced to work with only a moderate platform of government mandates. This type of system in Canada has led to excruciatingly long wait times for MRI results and for intensive surgeries, not to mention sky-high tax rates.
McCain has worked to reform health care before and he’ll continue this as president. His support of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act in 1996 — which simplifies administration of health insurance and improves continuity within group and individual markets — is just one example of his actions to get more people the coverage they need.
Andy Post welcomes comments at apost@mndaily.com.














6 Comments
To flag an inappropriate comment please login.
McCain's health care plan provides Andy Post the best coverage
OK I get it. Your coverage and my coverage will not change, but our taxes will go up, under Obama's plan. Indeed, this is not the best plan for you and me and all who attended the RNC and many who attend UMN. But upper middle-class-white-people (Men in particular) are not the reason our health care system is broken. For those selfish-minded enough to only consider how a new system will affect their own life, McCaine wins among these rich/upper middle-class, employed, white Men. But for those who are now unemployed, or who work minimum wage jobs without benifits; for those who have children, work 35 hr shifts at walmart, and don't get included as 'full-time', and even those who are 65 yo obese smoking truck drivers without the means to live healthfully, should they just rott? I mean, who's case are you making, ours or theirs? I'm not so worried about my healthcare coverage, but I am not autistic either. I have compassion for those who were not born with my set of cards, and I believe in helping them, EVEN at the expense of higher taxes. Is the tragedy of our health care system that negligent dr.s are punished into bankruptcy or is it those who become bankrupt through sickness? Do you know the disparity in these two sets of numbers? Do you not care for those without the means to become Dr.s? If someone in their generation had just worked alot harder, they would be living that American dream both you and I enjoy from our parents. Yes, they did it to themselves.
You do realize we spend >2X every other industrialized nation, all of which have socialized healthcare. So let's not throw around deceiving statements about such systems. If anything, they are struggling because they are underfunded. Something we should be able to accommodate with costs expected to hit 20% GDP in the coming decade. The largest GDP in the world.
McCain Healthcare Reply
"those who are 65 yo obese smoking truck drivers without the means to live healthfully"
So it assumed that a 65 yo obese smoking truck driver is unable to quit smoking and lose weight? And that should be the taxpayer's problem.
Not in my world!
I'm willing to help those who were dealt a tough set of cards, but for those who simply lack willpower re: controllable behaviors, hell no!
then we can work together
I'm not for giving those who care not for good health a blank tax check for health care. I'm for working with peoples incentives, and if that means some choose to be unhealthy and die, so be it. But the plan McCain offers does not help out the least-of-us who do wish to help themselves. And your article makes no mention of such people. Isn't that the problem with Healthcare right now? Maybe not for you. Protect the Dr.s, Protect the taxpayer, Protect me!!!! A fair healthcare system is about the least of us, (who WANT better health, I'll give you that much.) Nothing you praise about McCaines plan even considers such people, while you and my costs will change very little under BOTH policies. Reforming healthcare is not about US, so let's not put a bandaid on it for publicity sake and change nothing.
To sum it up...
To sum it up, you want something for nothing.
The Health Care Crisis Dissected
Rising Medical Care Costs are the consequence of
1. Most adults, and now some children as young as 8 years of age, must visit their doctors regularly (every 6 months or more) to check for risk factors (such as high blood pressure, sugar and cholesterol) for developing illnesses such arteriosclerosis, heart disease and stroke. If present they usually must be treated with one or more medications. There are screening tests of body fluids, X-rays, CAT scans and MRIs for early detection of various problems, including many cancers. This practice of preventive medicine began in the latter half of the 20th century and has added a huge and growing cost burden to the health care system. The insurance industry believes it is cost effective in terms of sickness prevention and so monitors doctors to make certain they follow “best practices” with respect to screening for and treating risk factors with medications.
2. Unlike medications for actual diseases such as infections, anemia or stomach ulcers, treating risk factors involves regular doctor visits and taking medication everyday for the rest of your life, even though you have no symptoms and are not actually sick. Big Pharma has responded to this growing opportunity with many 100’s of new and expensive medications which they market extensively to the consumer on TV and in print media. Marketing is much more effective than most people realize. Marketing has made Lipitor, just one of several cholesterol lowering drugs, the best selling drug in history, with annual sales of $12 billion. Lipitor doesn’t cure anything and it doesn’t really help all that many people, An antibiotic for a bladder infection usually cures 98% of patients in 7-10 days. Lipitor taken for 5 years has been shown to benefit only 1% of high risk patients. After 5 years they have no solid evidence that Lipitor is doing more good than harm. (Pfizer’s marketing division could give lessons to Walmart, McDonalds and Starbucks.)
3. Taking these “preventive” medications does not actually prevent but only delays the onset of the multiple diseases associated with aging. Most people over 60 have one or more chronic medical problems for which they must see, not just their primary care doctor but one or more specialists as well. In the last 40 years we have developed amazingly effective, complex and ever more expensive technology and expertise to deal with these chronic medical problems. The availability of, the need for and the cost of this technology and expertise is rising rapidly. Kidney dialysis units are full 24/7 and they’re not being built fast enough to keep up with demand. A specialist in Memphis can manipulate a robot in Peoria to remove an adrenal gland tumor… well you get my point. Lung, heart, kidney, liver and bone marrow transplants are now commonplace, limited only by availability of healthy organs. Stem cell therapy is being developed aggressively. Recently ABC News reported success at regenerating an entire rat heart, which then began beating to the wondering eyes of the media. (This is indeed good news for Dick Cheney!)
4. There is a growing shortage of primary care doctors, the so called “gate keepers” of the health care system. This means that more elderly patients will primarily depend on specialist care rather than primary care. This will drive up the costs more quickly. David Walker, head of the GAO has predicted with great certainty that the United States of America will go bankrupt in approximately 2018 due to the expense of millions of baby boomers becoming eligible for Medicare.
5. Providing everyone from an early age with Health Insurance does not solve the problem. Baby Boomer numero uno, Bill Clinton has already had his first heart attack before he even turned 60. You can only imagine how much his acute and now follow up care is costing the taxpayers. Tim Russert from “Meet the Press” on TV, had fine insurance and treatable risk factors, went to his doctor and took his pills, yet dropped dead of a heart attack at age 58. (His dying saved his health insurance company a bundle.)
6. It should be apparent that with respect to Health Insurance and care we Americans are grossly over using the system. The doctors and all their magic technology can barely keep up. And the “not keeping up” problem is going to get much worse as the 78 million Baby Boomers become eligible for Medicare. Health Insurance for Americans is so costly for the same reasons that flood insurance is so expensive in New Orleans and hurricane insurance in South Florida. Cost is based on risk and Blue Cross, Blue Shield, Aetna, Humana, Unicare, Cigna, Anthem, Carefirst and Kaiser are very good at calculating risk. In fact they are so good it’s giving them a giant headache of miserable public relations.
7. Let’s look at the problem of pre-existing medical conditions. The public and the politicians all want them covered, with no exclusions. Hey that’s only fair. People who are already sick need insurance now! But think about it for a minute and apply some common sense. Say you own a nice home, cost you 300 grand, well furnished in a nice neighborhood. The mortgage is pretty steep, you’ve got a couple of teenagers, you and the wife have nice cars. So to cut expenses you didn’t buy home owners insurance. One day there is a grease fire in the kitchen, it spreads to the curtains, then the wooden cabinets and throwing pans of water is not working. Thinking quickly you call State Farm. Hello! Do you really think they are going to sell you fire insurance on the spot when the Fire Department is already on the way? Well, that is what many are expecting from the Blues and all the rest of them. That is turning healthcare “insurance” into a healthcare entitlement. Unless you are on a public program such as Medicare or Medicaid that is just not going to happen.
Yeah, that Lipitor is pretty
Yeah, that Lipitor is pretty much a scam. Niacin works better and much faster than Lipitor, but it doesn't cost anything. No one pays for a commercial or training for something that doesn't cost anything. When did all this happen?
Post new comment