BY Briana Bierschbach
PUBLISHED: 12/02/2008
Parking in the City of Minneapolis may soon get more difficult for motorists, but easier for bicyclists.
A proposed amendment to parking regulations, proposed to the City Council this month, will allow future developments to provide fewer off-street parking spaces than they currently do. The amendment also seeks to increase bicycle parking in the city.
Most businesses currently have an off-street parking requirement of one space per 300 square feet. The amendment would reduce this requirement for most uses, to one space per 500 square feet.
Bicycle parking requirements could also change. The City currently doesn’t require bicycle parking citywide, but changes would require almost all newly established businesses to accommodate at least three bicycles.
Jason Wittenberg, planning supervisor for the city , said having more places to park bicycles will promote cycling as a mode of transportation and reduce pollutants.
“Hopefully providing bicycle parking will become second-nature ... in the same way that most businesses don’t think twice about providing automobile parking when constructing a new building,” he said.
Wittenberg said many of the changes stem from the Minneapolis Plan for Sustainable Growth, which was approved by the City Council in July 2008.
The plan seeks to promote transit, walking, and biking as transportation alternatives through reduced parking requirements, while encouraging transit incentive programs, according to city documents .
Rachel Weinberger, assistant professor of city and regional planning at the University of Pennsylvania, recently conducted a study in New York City on off-street parking by comparing two similar neighborhoods with one major difference — one has more off-street parking than the other.
According to the study results, residents in the neighborhood with more off-street parking were 45 percent more likely to drive to work, despite access to public transit.
“When you have that convenient level of parking available, owning a car is a much more natural choice,” she said. “And once you own it, well gosh, then you always use it.”
Weinberger said Minneapolis needs to be strategic about where it reduces the requirements for off-street parking. Focusing on areas near a light rail or around the University, where public transit is readily available, is a good idea, she said.
“You want to make it easier for people to come, but harder for them to come by car,” she said.
Current off-street parking regulations date back to 1963, when post-World War II communities were switching from street cars to cars, Wittenberg said.
Most cities adopted off-street parking requirements by the 1950s and 1960s to alleviate street congestion in the new “automobile-centric” society, he said.
But since then, things have changed, Second Ward council member Cam Gordon, said. Lately, many businesses have been applying for variances for fewer required parking spaces, and receiving them, he said.
“Fewer parking spaces seem to be working out for these places,” he said, adding that Minneapolis is moving toward getting people out of their cars and becoming a more transit-oriented city.
Business first-year Amy Wallender, however, is not enthusiastic about the idea of having less off-street parking in the city.
“We need parking,” she said. “Businesses are constantly expanding and it seems like we’re always looking for new parking.”
The proposal will go to the zoning and planning committee on Dec. 18 and to the full City Council by the end of the month for a final vote.














11 Comments
To flag an inappropriate comment please login.
Commercial? Residential?
I think it should be clarified whether these changes strictly apply to new commercial developments or if they also include new residential developments. If they are thinking about reducing the requirements for off street parking and it doesn't explicitly exclude rental property owners in neighborhoods like SE Como a bicycle is about the only thing you'll ever fit down the street. Many of the streets are already so bad that they are practically reduced to one-way, one-lane roads. Further reducing the space available for parking isn't going to get more people to walk/bike/bus to the U, which is already something they do everyday. And I'd find it hard to think it'll also encourage Jr. to leave his car at the parents house and get rides back and forth on the weekends.
Commercial
Most of the changes apply to new commercial developments, or buisnesses as the article states.
According to city documents: substantial changes are not proposed for minimum parking standards for residential uses outside of downtown, or new residential developments. However, special residential parking standards near the University of Minnesota are being considered through a completely separate process.
Preventing large parking lots
This change is more about preventing the creation of large parking lots to provide parking for commercial uses. The Board of Adjustments have been giving out parking variances left and right because there's no way some uses would open without the variance and in general, it encourages new development to build large parking areas. A yoga studio may require 20 or more parking spaces but a small gym (Snap, Anytime, Etc) may only require 7. A restaurant may require 30 or 40 stalls.
As for the comment about new commercial development, yes. However, if a new use enters an existing building, that would trigger the parking standards. For example, if you had a retail space and a restaurant moves in, a new parking requirement is created. Yoga place moves in after the restaurant, a new parking requirement.
Thanks for the its much
Thanks for the its much appreciated
oyunlaroyunlar modacıkız oyun sohbet odaları laminat parke
From a commercial
From a commercial perspective, this is not a wise idea.
perspective
Completely agree with the above comment. Thanks for sharing this.
-
Mark G. debt quote| cailis
re
Commenting usually isnt my thing, but ive spent an hour on the site, so thanks for the info
Great post and thanks for the
Great post and thanks for the sharing..
it is so cool.. like the most
it is so cool.. like the most people
this website many people tell
this website many people tell me ,so i ususally read it
everyone like it
everyone like it
Post new comment