Two of the RNC 8 have embarked on a “mini-West Coast tour” that they hope will raise awareness of their case and funds to help compensate for the expected $250,000 price tag attached to their legal proceedings.
Following the Republican National Convention, activists Max Specktor and Rob Czernik were each charged with four felonies — including conspiracy to riot and conspiracy to damage property, both in furtherance of terrorism — along with six co-defendants.
They say the charges are trumped up in an attempt to stifle dissent. Their trials are expected to start this fall.
This week, Czernik and Specktor, a University of Minnesota cultural studies junior, are visiting the Pacific Northwest, including two colleges, to tell their story.
And beyond simply conveying that they believe the “terrorism” counts leveled against them have wide-reaching, negative implications on activists everywhere, they hope to net some money for their defense.
“We’re building a movement around building awareness,” Czernik said.
Supporters of the RNC 8 sent an e-mail to other backers a few weeks ago, suggesting student groups invite the co-defendants to speak. Most schools set aside funding — called honorariums — to allow groups to host notable guests. The money would help the RNC 8 cover mounting legal fees.
Monday night, Specktor and Czernik presented at Evergreen State College in Olympia, Wash ., after a student group there invited them. From the school, the group secured $1,500 to pay for basic expenses for Specktor and Czernik — and then some.
The $1,500 honorarium covered flights for Specktor and Czernik, who are staying with friends in Washington, Oregon and California during their week-long tour.
Between that honorarium, one from a second stop at Reed College in Portland, Ore. , and donations, Specktor expects the RNC 8 will come away with roughly $3,000.
“It’s not like this money is just going to me and Rob,” he said, noting that recent fundraising efforts, such as concerts and other events, have yielded sizeable contributions to the RNC 8 defense fund.
Attorneys for the RNC 8 are essentially working pro bono, Specktor said, taking whatever payment the co-defendants can offer. Still, working the case is time-consuming and has the added pressure of being a possible precedent-setter.
“I don’t think we’ll ever be done [fundraising],” he said. “It’s pretty surprising how much we’ve been doing.”
Police arrested the RNC 8 preemptively for allegedly planning to violently disrupt September’s RNC in St. Paul.
The never-before-used terrorism charges are extreme, they say, backed by overzealous prosecutors who used invasive and inappropriate statutory law, the Minnesota version of the PATRIOT Act.
Their first speaking engagement Monday night at Evergreen State drew about 50 people who listened and asked questions, Specktor said. He and Czernik spoke about their case and crackdowns on dissent.
Especially for people in the northwest who do similar organizing to the RNC 8, Specktor said there’s a lot that can be learned from the case involving him and his co-defendants.
“Although we are being targeted for doing public organizing, people should not let it get them down,” he said.
Despite the highly political nature of the RNC 8 case, Specktor and Czernik say there has been little reluctance by institutions to have members of the RNC 8 speak, except for a church in northern Minnesota that backed out of hosting an event because of a fear of counter-protesters.
“Colleges are always supposed to be this bastion for free thought,” Czernik said. “It wouldn’t look good for an administration to say we couldn’t speak.”
Evergreen State spokesman Jason Wettstein said by state law, the school is required to remain politically neutral when it comes to guest speakers on campus. Reed College spokesman Kevin Myers said it’s hard to imagine that the small liberal arts college wouldn’t welcome the RNC 8.
The RNC 8 are beginning to plan a late April tour of campuses in Colorado.
For now, the activists are enjoying the warm reception they’ve been shown in their first days on the West Coast.
“I’m just excited that people are really concerned about what’s going on,” Specktor said. “People out here are genuinely concerned and genuinely supportive.”
Specktor and Czernik will stay one more night in Portland, Ore., where Tuesday they spoke at Reed College. Then, it’s on to San Francisco and Santa Cruz, Calif., for a couple of events before they return to the Twin Cities early next week.
— Karlee Weinmann is a senior staff reporter.








Serving the University of Minnesota Community since 1900
4 Comments
To comment, please login.
well... that's what you get
I think it's terrible that people who willingly raise their voices (and threats) will not willingly accept the consequences of their actions. Don't get me wrong; I am all one for peaceful protesting- when it is in a peaceful, civil manner. I don't know exactly what transpired, but I know that a lot of the anti-RNC students are loud and devils without a cause. And for them to go on a tour about what they "learned"?! Oh, yes, they need some guise to make other poor college kids pay for their own stupid actions. I'm neither Republican nor Democrat, but I am glad the college kids with money (more than likely Republicans) will not financially support the RNC 8's über-liberal, radical, and senseless ways.
somebody is confused...
i think its terrible that you, anonymous, think the consequences of free speech should be 20+ years in prison. anyone opposing the status quo HAS to be loud in order to be heard. since you readily admit your own ignorance regarding the rnc8 and their case, i might suggest looking into it further, minus the goggles that brainwash you to believe corporate media and cop propaganda.
furthermore, since you are so concerned about folks 'getting what they get,' which i would call accountability, perhaps you ought to consider that protest can actually achieve accountability... in this case holding the dirty elite of the republican party to answer to unspeakable crimes they are responsible for committing. and actually honorariums do not come out of broke kids' pockets.
They Broke the Law. Period.
I fail to see how creating a civil uprising and property damage is a way to hold the "dirty elite of the Republican party to answer for their unspeakable crimes."
This is coming from a registered Democrat.
These people don't deserve that much prison time, but they do deserve punishment. While the rest of us were peacefully protesting like we are afforded, they took it to the next level and broke the law - and they have to pay for their actions.
That they even dare compare themselves to the Little Rock 9 by calling themselves the RNC 8 is almost insulting - they are criminals by a literal definition, and while both of us were at the RNC last year, the difference is that I and countless others managed to keep our control.
And that's why we're not on trial. I believe 20 years is excess, but I'm sick of hearing their whining and pleading for support.
You broke the law. Suffer the consequences, else you should've thought more thoroughly about it beforehand.
They broke what law?
>> That they even dare compare themselves to the Little Rock 9 by calling themselves the RNC 8 is almost insulting - they are criminals by a literal definition, and while both of us were at the RNC last year, the difference is that I and countless others managed to keep our control. <<
So, if you're charged with a crime, you're a criminal?
What happened to the old presumption of innocence?
Perhaps you should research the RNC 8 case. You would find out quickly that the defendants did not break a window or harm a person during the RNC in St. Paul, because they were were preemptively arrested and locked up before the convention started.
This is a political prosecution. The RNC 8 are charged with Conspiracy to Riot in Furtherance of Terrorism, the first ever such charge under Minnesota's version of the USA PATRIOT Act. Their group, the RNC Welcoming Committee, was infiltrated by an undercover cop, police plants and a FBI informant. All of allegations in the criminal complaint are from paid police informants.
I assume that a "registered Democrat" upholds the Bill of Rights, and, when properly informed, will conclude that the prosecution of the RNC 8 represents the repression of dissent.