Two opposing protests in front of a Stadium Village military recruitment office Thursday — totaling about 50 people — led to at least one fight, though no arrests were made.
Members of the Students for a Democratic Society and Anti-War Committee lined up on Washington Avenue to protest military involvement in the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq Thursday morning.
In opposition to the protest, students from the University of Minnesota’s College Republicans, as well as veterans and supporters, positioned themselves in front of the recruiting office, carrying signs accusing the original protestors of being unpatriotic.
One sign read, “End the war by winning it.”
The dual protest began peacefully, with each group trying to muffle the other’s message in a shouting competition from separate sides of the street. Eventually, members of SDS, the Anti-War Committee and supporters crossed the street to protest in front of the military recruiting office, resulting in a brief physical altercation between the opposing groups leaving a few protestors pushed to the ground.
Police arrived on the scene shortly after, and the protest went on peacefully.
Sgt. Ryan Mueller, a team leader at the recruiting station, said the recruiting office re-opened last week. He said no recruitments were made Thursday.
Thursday’s protest was one of many demonstrations planned throughout the Twin Cities area in an effort to stop recruits from enlisting.
Grace Kelley, member of SDS, said she joined the student group less than a year ago in preparation for the Republican National Convention protest. The English senior said the group’s slogan for Thursday’s protest was, “Recruiters lie and people die.”
Holding a sign that read, “Save students, stop recruiters,” Linden Gawboy, who is currently unemployed, said she came to Thursday’s protest to show solidarity with the students who are against recruiting on campus. She said because the cost of tuition is rising, many students are being forced to turn to the military to help pay for expenses; she said she believes people should enter the military freely.
Beth Englund attended Thursday’s protest. Her son, Rob Emerson, came home Wednesday night from serving in Afghanistan for the last six months. He is currently stationed in Cherry Point, N.C.
Englund said although she thinks the people protesting have the right to voice their opinion, she feels the protest was disrespectful to the United States and those enlisted in the military.
Chairman of College Republicans and political science senior Abdul-Rahman Magba-Kamara called those protesting military enlistment “un-American.”
“You can be against the war, and that’s fine … but you can’t be against our military in general, that just doesn’t make any sense,” he said.









Serving the University of Minnesota Community since 1900
43 Comments
To comment, please login.
Further on the signs
I counted at least three signs in favor of waterboarding held by pro-recruitment students.
I won't kid you--I'm against the war and against recruiting, but there's a big difference between someone who just wants to go into the military and someone who will hold a sign saying that we ought to waterboard our enemies.
I was not impressed by the members of the College Republicans at this demonstration--the guy with the microphone who kept picking out the one visibly Muslim woman in the crowd, for example, which was just creepy.
you must have been somewhere else
i didn't hear anything about a Muslim woman and i was there for over an hour and half.
Maybe we just didn't
Maybe we just didn't overlap--and it was a loud event, I'm sure things happened that I didn't hear. But the guy with the microphone did call out a visibly Muslim woman in the crowd, say that in "her country" they probably didn't have rights like us and so on. It was creepy. "I don't think you're American even though I have NO evidence of your citizenship and so you shouldn't complain about waterboarding because somewhere else they do more torture"? That doesn't make sense. And it felt a lot like "you don't LOOK American so what you think doesn't count."
I
And on waterboarding
There are LOTS of people in the military who don't support waterboarding. There are LOTS of people coming back from Iraq who are messed up by what they saw, experienced--and did. That's tragic. One of the huge reasons NOT to allow torture techniques like waterboarding is that then you need to have a bunch of torturers on your side. You end up destroying people by making them into torturers--watch a couple of documentaries like Standard Operating Procedure or read some solder memoirs if you doubt me.
It's so weird-there are a TON of books about people's experience in WWII, Viet Nam and the first Gulf War where soldiers talk about how horrible it was to kill and torture and how much they regret what they did. And there's all those PTSD cases coming back from Iraq.
Why are 1/3 of homeless people vets? Why are vets WAY more likely to be unemployed? Is it because they're weak? No, it's because they get screwed up by the experience of being in the army and then they don't get any decent benefits when they get back.
It's not just about the Iraq war or waterboarding--it's about the way people get used up by the military and then spit out. Like I say, I was NOT impressed by the guy with the microphone talking about how the people protesting were unpatriotic, terrorists, etc, for objecting to a military that destroys its own people.
Proponents of waterboarding...
...should be buried alive.
That's because he wasn't
That's because he wasn't picking on the Muslim woman. He was picking on the woman with the microphone who was chanting anti-war slogans and swearing at him...
Proponents of waterboarding should be buried alive? Wow, you are an enlightened individual. I see your high sense of morality and advocacy of human rights with that statement. Waterboarding is terrible, but burying people alive is fine by me! Kudos to you.
If I had information about a
If I had information about a terrorist attack on a large American city that would kill thousands of Democrats, maybe I should be waterboarded. And what's with the anti-choice extremists who want to take away a women's constitutional right to enlist and service her country? Don't like out service, don't join then.
I'm confused as to why these
I'm confused as to why these student groups are against Military recruiting near College campuses. Why wouldn't the Military want as many College educated recruits as possible?
Linden, who not surprisingly is unemployed, makes a terrible argument. The way she talk, you'd think you were forced to join if National Guard recruiters hit you with a paintball as you left Chipostle.
And by the way, WATERBOARDING WORKS. Your precious President Obama would like you to think it doesn't, but it prevented an attack on Los Angeles using high-jacked airplanes from Asia. I suppose spilling water on Top Terrorist Leaders isn't worth protecting innocent Americans.
cite sources, plz...
cite sources, plz... (credible) links or it didn't happen.
You un-American prick.
You un-American prick. Torture is not an American value.
Go away with your fascist ideas. We don't need your right wing, authoritarian stance ruining our country.
wtrbrding no wrk
Joey, if waterboarding works so damn well, why did we have to waterboard Khalid Sheikh Mohammed ALMOST 200 TIMES? It's not like he gave more and more info each time he was waterboarded.
Please don't believe what Fox and Limbaugh tell you.
WATERBOARDING WORKS... not.
First of all, it creates so much blowback that even the nationalist supremacist camp, the southern conservatives, military community,etc have all come out against torture. It weakens the empire and will deny Americans safety to exist in the world. It unites the world against Americans --a world all too ignorant and violent, and prone to scape-goating wealthy countries anyway.
Secondly, the intel. is unreliability.
But even if the intel. were reliable enough to be tactically useful (in excess of the errors and atrocities), torturing would STILL be a really stupid policy. Torturing human beings is immoral, it denies and repudiates our spiritual values and our belief and knowledge that humans are divine creatures-- transcendentally more important than any materialistic goals that may be involved in the tortures, the wars, etc. Do you get it? What kind of person do you want to be? What kind of world are you trying to create for our future generations? And not incidentally-- how long do you want humanity to exist? a hundred years? or 1000? So I say, these militarists are ignorant like children, they are savages and they are holding back the evolutionary progress of humanity. Ironically, they say, some things are worth dying for -- but they're talking about somebody else. I say, YES, some things are worth dying for. It is better to suffer the crimes of terrorists and other criminals, rather than diminish our own humanity by indiscriminate killing in war, or torturing captured people.
Dear advocates of
Dear advocates of waterboarding and other "enhanced" techniques, surely you must know that these are crimes under the Uniform Code of Military Justice? The scum who tortured helpless prisoners at Abu Graib received stiff prison sentences for what they did. True, they didn't waterboard, but they did commit crimes of the sort that you tough guys seem to like. One scumbag was sentenced to ten years in Leavenworth, another got eight years, & slackwit Lynndie England was sentenced to three.
So waterboard away, tough guys. I'll send you a post card when you wind up in Leavenworth.
Funny how the same people who
Funny how the same people who are all for CAPTURING and INDEFINITELY IMPRISONING terrorism suspects from other countries while TORTURING them are the same people who think other countries should unconditionally release American spy suspects (Roxana Saberi?). Do I smell a double-standard? Yes, as a matter of fact I do.
And the neo-Nazi
And the neo-Nazi's come out. Welcome to Minnesota.
Abu Graib.....dude, do you know who much I used to pay at Ground Zero to get the panties on the head treatment? And these guys got it for free.
I'm Dave.
I'm an idiot. Nobody knows what the hell I'm talking about. I will go bury myself. You can disregard my comments.
Whats with you and burying
Whats with you and burying everything... kinda weird... I bet you were the dumb ass with the rainbow hair? If you want i'll treat you to the strip club you can finally get laid, release some stress. Those protest girls were tougher than the dudes I don't blame you~
I think
I will bury you with me. You seem like fun.
Picture
Sweet main picture for the article!
Yeah that dude cleary pwned
Yeah that dude cleary pwned her!
I don't know man, it looks
I don't know man, it looks like she is shouting louder. Thoughts?
That guy looks like he's
That guy looks like he's hungry for a Chipotle burrito. Good thing there's one on the corner!
Mmmm....
Mmmm..... Chipotle.
I think that everyone would be happy and the world at peace if we just gave them all free burritos. Delicious, mouthwatering, heavenly burritos. With guacamole. Can't forget the guac.
Hey, at the very least, it would shut everyone up for the 20 or so minutes it takes to scarf down that whole thing.
Angry liberals
Oh oh, the liberals are getting angry.
Hey! Weren't you the one
Hey! Weren't you the one that was gonna bury himself? Get to it already!
I have reason to believe that
I have reason to believe that one of the people holding the waterboarding sign at the MN College Republicans event is a sleeper agent for a Timothy McVeigh type terrorist cell. I think he should be waterboarded 246 times on Northorp Mall to obtain the needed information. I think the member of the College Republicans who said " We should do waterboarding all the time" should be the first interrogator. I do hope that the free ticket offer still stands
they're dumb
I dont think the protesters understand the concept of college students who join the military. People who are in college and sign up are most likely going the officer route in which case enlisted recruiters are avoided entirely. On the other hand, if a student decides to drop out and enlist i highly doubt that one station pushed them to do it. This is the same shit that happened in Berkley, they protested in front of an officer selection office and not an enlisted recruit station and didn't know what the hell they were even protesting against or what an OSO even does.
Love all the same ol' same ol' Faux news rhetoric
1. Torture does not give credible evidence. FBI got the info of 911 before the CIA started the torture. (if you watch something other than Faux News you would know that)
2. the LA even was not true, and if it was Bill O'Reily would have celebrated it.
3. Those demonstrating and shutting down the recruiters station are not against the troops, they are against our Gov. and the military lying to those who want to enlist. All they are demanding is truth be told to those who want to enlist. Maybe if people would get their heads out of the sand and read the brochure, or even read some of the signs the demonstrators have they would know that.
4. Many of those demonstrating are people who have loved ones who served, or were in the service themselves.. Many of the students in YAWR were recruited themselves and tell of the lies told to them my the recruiters and the illegal harassment.
5. Many of the groups involved in shutting the stations down care deeply of both the troops and the innocent victims of war. We just want our troops home now, and stop the BS and lying to the public and the troops.
I see that you are one of the
I see that you are one of the few ignorant people who cannot believe that a second wave attack was averted by information gained from waterboarding. Ironically, do don't believe it because it *wasn't* on Fox News. (I take it that if it was on Fox News you would have believed it??) I guess you are probably also one of those people who think that the moon landing was staged in the Nevada desert.
Signs of the Times
Thankfully, these junior fascists are not running the country -- not at the moment, anyway. They keep forgetting that their support of torture -- along with their illegal wars and their economic crisis -- are the primary reasons they and their party were tossed out of power. Maybe that's why they're so angry at the demonstrators (the guy in the front-page photo was particularly belligerent, especially toward the women in the crowd).
Regardless, I hope they keep showing up and I hope they keep bringing their "Free Waterboarding Tickets" signs (side note: that particular sign also had a "Semper Fi" sticker on it). That pretty much sums up what their side stands for. And if the U.S. armed forces keep enlisting people like that, then we can expect more scandals like Abu Ghraib in the future.
which wars are illegal and
which wars are illegal and how?
To those who think torture works or is justified
I suggest you all read a book called "Oath Betrayed," which was written by the U of M's own Dr. Steven Miles, about the abuses at Abu Graib and Guantanamo.
"but it prevented an attack on Los Angeles using high-jacked airplanes from Asia."
According to whom?
According to the CIA
And very recently confirmed by Obama's National Intelligence Director. Do yourself a favor and take the time to actually read the primary sources before you spout your talking points from Moveon.org. Read, in particular, the documents that Obama just ordered released. It lays it out very well in there. Stop with the revisionist history already -- you just come off sounding ignorant.
To all of you here
To war protesters: There are still U.S. soldiers dying in a war. Approach them from a place of compassion, not hostility.
To the soldiers: It is a fact that you are responsible for supporting the killing of hundreds of thousands of civilians in foreign countries. Own up to that responsibility and make the choice to stop it immediately.
I will make the choice on whether or not to defend myself and my loved ones when the time comes, but don't you dare claim to be defending my interests.
Good job suggesting AWOL.
Good job suggesting AWOL. That will look great when applying for a new job (beside the minor detail its illegal).
I would rather NOT be protesting
I would rather the recruiters clean the defaced station.. better than spending another day lying to a young person to try and get them to join so they make the quota and not get demoted.
There are a lot of worse things than having to clean off the posters.
As a demonstrator, there are many weekends, and family times I have missed trying to educate and stop this military madness. I would rather not be protesting. I would rather NOT marching, in freezing weather. I would rather NOT have to copy down the names of troops killed in Iraq and Afganistan and then read them off in public.
I would rather NOT have to listen to another soldier tell his soul torturing story of what he did.
I would rather NOT have to watch and listen to the soldiers during "Winter Soldier"
I would rather NOT have to hold a mother or sister who broke down after telling me their loved one was killed in Iraq, or committeed suicide.
I would rather not look into the eyes of a female troop who was raped by a commanding officer and still had to go back overseas.
I would rather not have to have my cousin tell me her stepson isn't coming back to U.S. on leave because it is harder on him to leave family again than to just stay in Iraq. He is on 4th tour as a sniper. I would rather NOT have to keep the pain in my soul knowing that when he finally does come back, if he does, he won't be well and neither will his family.
I would rather NOT have to protest in front of recruiters's station.. just like the many others there would like NOT to have to protest
thank you MN Daily
I think you are the only major paper covering this.
If main media covered real news like MN Daily does.. maybe we wouldn't have to protest, and maybe newspapers wouldn't be failing
Ann: Your story is all well
Ann:
Your story is all well and good. It must make you feel are warm and fuzzy inside. Even though you say you are doing this for the benefit of the soldiers, nearly every one of your statements started with "I."
Like you considering your time spent with family and friends versus demonstrating against military recruitment, prospective soldiers are presented similar dilemmas. The difference is the decision the soldiers make FOR THEMSELVES does not involve a consistent place to call home. Sure, recruiters are going to pump up service, enticing potential recruits. Have you ever been told in an interview that the company is a piece of crap and you're an idiot for considering them? What I think most of you protestors fail to realize is these prospective recruits are not helpless or brain-dead. They know the motives of the recruiters. They know the ramifications of their decisions. Let them make them on their own. I have several friends who have entered into the service and spent time overseas in the sh*t in different capacities for different reasons. A few because they wanted to pay for school. One because school wasn't working out so he needed a new direction in life. Another joined out of a feeling of duty. Every single one made the decision for themselves and absolutely none of them regret it, even the one blown up in Afghanistan--thank God he wasn't taken from us.
Look, no one in their right mind enjoys war and its terrible side effects. The fact of the matter is, this nation, every nation, needs to defend itself. I'm glad that there are fellow citizens of mine who hear that call and volunteer. I'm glad we don't have a draft which would put sissies like you in defense of my beloved nation. It may be a cliche, but we wouldn't be here right now, you wouldn't be demonstrating, if we didn't have heroes like these willing to lay it all on the line for us. I often regret not volunteering, but I'm glad there are plenty who do.
How come liberal-leaning people, of all people, fail to recognize the right of someone to choose their own path in life? How come liberal-leaning people seem to feel it is not the individual's responsibility, rather the collective's responsibility to determine what is right and wrong for someone?
Will the greatest country this world has ever seen (Liberals, read: The United State of America) ever realize individual accountability again? We can only hope.
God, Bless the United State of America. Sweet land of LIBERTY.
Accountability
"How come liberal-leaning people, of all people, fail to recognize the right of someone to choose their own path in life?"
Would you say the same to the thousands of Iraqi civilians dying under U.S. bombs? How about the children of Afghanistan shredded by unexploded cluster bombs? How about those developing cancer from d.u. ammunition we use in the region?
It is always considered terrorism when they come here and do it to us, but not when we go there and do it to them.
"How come liberal-leaning people seem to feel it is not the individual's responsibility, rather the collective's responsibility to determine what is right and wrong for someone?"
Because the individual, as a part of the military machine, is not held accountable for killing people abroad. Because we, as a country, have a collective responsibility to stop it.
Direct action gets the goods! Check out TC Indymedia for more
This article misses an overwhelmingly important part of the story, which is that the anti-war protest was only one of five coordinated actions throughout the Twin Cities, plus another at MSU-Mankato, for "Zero Recruitment Day." - not to mention the lockdown at the Oak/Washington station going on today (Friday).
Not a single one of the other actions had any counter-protesters show up. Clearly, majority opinion is in favor of shutting down military recruitment - which, ironically, the counter-protesters helped do yesterday by their crazy spectacle. While the patriots just seem to enjoy being annoying when it's convenient to do so, people who care about human life more than flags are consistently taking direct action against war and militarism.
People can see a play-by-play of all the actions and more information on the issues at TC Indymedia: http://twincities.indymedia.org.
LOL...
"Clearly, majority opinion is in favor of shutting down military recruitment - which, ironically, the counter-protesters helped do yesterday by their crazy spectacle."
Seriously, since no one protested they must agree? LOL, I remember the statement "silence is agreement" from basic training. It was funny then to assume because no one spoke up that they agreed, just as it is funny now.
I am currently in Iraq, and I would have stopped by (at least on my way to Chipotle, we don't have those here...) to say hi, not necessarily in support of either side. Someone's right to get information about a job isn't what I would call a worthwhile cause, educating people interested in a job is...
My recruiter lied to me, but it was about the job I was interested in. I thought I would be working with IT networks. It didn't turn out that way and I was a bit upset with the outcome. However, I say it was my fault for not looking up the MOS I had been offered. Everyone has a free range of information regarding military jobs via the internet. Look it up. If it sounds too good to be true it may be.... but do the research yourself.
Some people say that the military will train you to do one thing but then have you do another. Well, yeah I've seent it in the military and as a civilian. I have held a job as an IT Network/System administrator with a small software company with duties that ranged from VPN management, database management, disaster recovery planning, to putting new office furniture together, and picking out fabrics for backdrops at converntions. The point being, any job title has the potential to be hollow.
I encourage everyone to speak out when they feel things need to be said, but to allow others with a different opinion to be respected as well.
Good night from Iraq
War will extinguish humanity
One can argue for hours with people who are for "freedom" and "democracy" brought by bombs and depleted uranium by a clearly superior military force. We should not waste our breath on people who carry signs that make light of or support waterboarding . These people are sad individuals who demonstrate a cavalier attitude toward a serious issue. They are both immature and uninformed. Don't they understand that when the United States, or any other country, uses torture it makes torture an option for all? How much do they really care about US soldiers? Of course, they are the ones in the minority. They don't realize this because the United States is not a democracy. The voice of the people is not being heard. The whole world knew that attacking Iraq was unjustified. But the United States government did not allow the checks and balances to work. I guess our Congress people had too much invested in the war to prevent it. Now, as the profits of war go to a small elite and corrupt group, and things get worse for ordinary citizens who are losing their homes and their pensions and their health care, the war is coming home. It will affect everyone, even those whose wealth make them seem untouchable. At a time when we are threatened by global warming, every possible cent should go toward dealing with that in the most intelligent way we can. Otherwise, the planet is toast. And as for the morality of war, the most important thing I ever learned in high school was from my history teachers, who team taught a section on the Civil War. They said that there has never been a war that has been fought about principles. Wars are always about gaining resources and strategic territory. These teachers were absolutely correct. Bless them. I hope I wasn't the only one to get their invaluable message.
The military is guilty- waged war on nonbelligerant nations
The Chairman of College Republicans defamed those protesting military enlistment as “un-American.” He said, “You can be against the war, and that’s fine … but you can’t be against our military in general, that just doesn’t make any sense.”
First of all we don't need any College Republicans' permission or approval for our political opinions or any other speech or beliefs whatsoever. The fact that he says "you can be against the war" speaks volumes about his authoritarian goals.
Secondly: The U.S. military is like any other institution-- without oversight or restraints, it would become a monster. And in fact that's what we have, today. A corrupt institution that wages a vast PR war against the American people, concealing virtually everything about its operations with the excuse that it's necessary in time of war. The U.S. military in fact, is an outlaw, a renegade agency that knowingly plans and executes wars in violation of treaties and conventions-- Wars against people who never attacked America (the Koreans, the Vietnamese and now the Iraqis ) in which millions of innocent people were killed.
I condemn the U.S. military. They have not served America. They disserved. The reputation and standing of the soldiers, the veterans, and the military institutions *comes from the character of their actions*, not by wishful thinking, or pushing their doctrines or beliefs on the public.