Politics

Variety of taxes on menu at Capitol

Tax increases proposed on cigarettes and tobacco, as well as new sales tax on digital media downloads.
Published: 04/27/2009
Advertisement

Facing a statewide budget deficit of nearly $4.6 billion over the next two years, state lawmakers want to take a variety of initiatives to raise revenue for the state.

The House of Representatives passed a tax bill on Saturday that would increase taxes on tobacco products and alcohol in the state, as well as extend the state sales tax to digital products downloaded on the Internet — the so-called, “iTunes tax.”

Taxes on alcohol products would increase between 7 cents and 68 cents per liter depending on the product , should these taxes pass the Legislature and the governor. Total increased alcohol revenue for the state would total more than $209 million during the upcoming two years.

Taxes on cigarettes would increase by 54 cents, to $1.77 per pack, in addition to the state’s sales tax . The state would receive more than $207 million in cigarette taxes under the plan.

On the floor of the House on Saturday, the bill’s author, Rep. Ann Lenczewski , DFL-Bloomington, defended the initiatives, which are part of a bill that would raise more than $1.7 billion in tax revenue during the upcoming biennium.

“If you are a cigarette smoker, we’re going to bring you up to just the Wisconsin level [of taxation],” she said. “On the alcohol tax, which has not been raised for 22 years … this is a voluntary part of the economy. There is nobody requiring anybody to buy alcohol.”

Republicans attacked the tax increases in the bill.

“This bill isn’t about a more progressive system,” Rep. Laura Brod , R-New Prague, said on Saturday. “This bill is actually about a more regressive tax code.”

A regressive tax places a higher burden on people with a lower income, University of Minnesota public affairs professor Jerry Zhao said. For example, if consumption of cigarettes is the same between someone with a high income and someone with a low income, the tax on the product will hurt the person with the lower income more.

Taxes on cigarettes, alcohol and other products get the distinction of being called “sin taxes,” because they tax socially taboo behavior such as smoking or drinking.

Sin taxes generally are more acceptable ways to raise revenue without gaining the ire of too many taxpayers, Zhao said.

Raising sin taxes has been a trend since the 1970s, he said, when states had different rules regarding raising property taxes.

Today, even though they can bring in smaller pots of revenue, Zhao said they can help states reach the ultimate goal of closing budget shortfalls.

“Many states use it to close the budget gap,” Zhao said. “In this kind of situation, every little bit helps.”

“iTunes” Tax

Should the Legislature adopt the House’s version of the tax bill, Minnesota would join about 20 other states that apply sales taxes to downloads of digital products such as music, movies, audio books, software and ringtones.

Rep. Jim Davnie , DFL-Minneapolis, said the plan would be fairer than the one now — taxing DVDs purchased in stores but not those purchased online is like applying taxes to those sold in Minneapolis but not St. Paul, he said.

The final tax would be applied to the purchaser of the music, so those purchasing online products using a credit card based in Minnesota would be affected by the tax, Davnie said. Other states, such as Washington, South Dakota and Wisconsin, apply this tax.

The tax is only expected to bring in $3.1 million next biennium, but Davnie said any bit helps.

“These really are drops in the ocean,” he said. “I’m not claiming that I’ve solved the budget deficit.”

On the floor Saturday, Brod took aim at the proposed tax increases.

“The iTunes tax, starting to tax downloads for music, which will hurt kids and adults, the cigarette tax … the alcohol tax increases,” she said. “I notice that there are tax increases for pretty much everybody.”

Proponents of the tobacco, alcohol and digital product taxes face plenty of opposition, however. None of the provisions are in the Senate’s tax bill , and Gov. Tim Pawlenty has threatened to veto tax increases should they come to him.

Like with other bills, members of the Senate and House will meet in a conference committee to reach an agreement on the tax proposals before sending it to Pawlenty.

-Devin Henry is a senior staff reporter

11 Comments

The Minnesota Daily wants to host a forum for discussion regarding issues and stories regarding the University of Minnesota and surrounding communities. However, the online comments should not be used to threaten or defame. This is a place for people to be heard, and want to contribute to discussion. Those who persist to use expletives, inappropriate, racist, defamatory or abusive postings risk losing the privilege to post.

To comment, please login.

How about instead of raising alcohol taxes, allow Sunday liquor sales for stores that want to open? That should raise some revenue for the State without raising taxes.

I agree. And bars should stay open one hour later. More service for bars. More service for taxi companies.

States are going to be very disappointed. Of the last 40 states to pass a new cigarette tax only 8 saw a rise in revenue and the others saw as much as a 68% drop. With this new Federal tax there is going to be an even a larger drop in revenue. When will these idiots understand they are taxing poor people into quitting with no hope of generating more income. You cannot hope to increase revenue and drive the very thing you are taxing out of business. This is going to cost the Federal and State Governments the Billions they are hoping to get plus Billions less than they are receiving now. Greed and stupidity are not a good mix. One Senator, on the floor of the Senate, said we will need 22 million new smokers to keep the SCHIP program funded. Without new smokers it will fail within 2 to 4 years. Has anyone noticed that smoking has gone from 54% to less than 24%? Looks like the smokers will be joined by all the Non-Smokers in paying for this SCHIP program the Anti-Smokers are so proud of. Then you will hear some real bitching. Being open to others being over taxed comes back to bite you and it will. It’s called Socialism and other ism’s we won’t like.

Sure. Tax the smokers. Who cares, right?

Those who cannot afford to buy cigarettes but are forced to roll their own from shreds of loose tobacco and scraps of paper are arguably the poorest well-defined minority group in all of America. President Obama was elected on a pledge that there would be no tax increases on those earning less than $250,000. . - .

And what was one of his very first actions as president? He hit the poorest of the poor with a tax increase of OVER TWO THOUSAND PERCENT ... from about a $1/pound for tobacco up to $24/pound. And just for kicks he threw in a 150% increase in the federal tax on cigarettes. And now Minnesota wants to add another 54 cents? . - .

This goes beyond unfair and enters into the realm of outright criminal. And speaking of criminal, I predicted last month that we would see a surge in cigarette robberies and heists and was called crazy for worrying about $10,000 convenience store robberies. Well, not only was I right about the convenience stores, but we have see at least three cigarette heists of trucks/warehouses in the million dollar plus range in the past few weeks as well as the discovery of a stash of over twenty million dollars worth of contraband cigs in Mississippi. . - .

The SCHIP tax will not be able to pay for the child insurance program as people quit or turn to the black market, health savings from quitters will prove to be invisible (See: http://pasan.thetruthisalie.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=7 for documentation), and the costs of the black market itself ranging from increased security costs at convenience stores passed on to customers, increased law enforcement and prison expenditures, and the incalculable costs of future terrorist activity funded by the black market... these costs will have to be paid by *ALL* taxpayers - not just smokers. . - .

Unreasonable smoking bans and taxes are based on a foundation of lies. People need to read beyond the flashy news stories and headlines to see those lies and fight what what is fair - not just for smokers but for all of us. . - .

Michael J. McFadden,
Author of "Dissecting Antismokers' Brains"

The point of taxing tobacco is to discourage people from smoking in the first places. It costs the US more money for treatment of cancer and emphysema patients that the US would make on a measly cigarette tax. It doesn't even balance out the cost of helping those who continue to smoke cigarettes, which mind you is the number one cause of preventable death in America. I say keep raising taxes on cigarettes and regulate what is going into them more severely.

HAVE YOUR VOICE BE HEARD AND MAKE A DIFFERENCE!!!
Taking action is easy and won't take much of your time, but it will make a giant difference: CLICK THE LINK http://www.axetaxesnotjobs.com/ and fill out the form to join the fight against irresponsible and regressive taxes.

"This will cost jobs in our industry— including those of small business owners, servers and bartenders like you who are the lifeblood of our economy. We need your personal involvement and help“

Thank you

Honestly though, who is really gonna bitch at 54 cents. Its pocket change compared to other spikes such as oil, cable tv services, and cell phones

Hah. Taxing music, audiobooks, and movie downloads. Who still buys those anyway? After these taxes pass, even less people will buy them, instead opting for torrent sites like the pirate bay. These sites provide just about any movie, TV show, audiobook, or music album you could want, for free, with no taxes. It will cause people to stop buying them altogether, and turning to other sources. There is no question they will lose revenue by taxing downloads just like cigarettes.

Anonymous wrote, "who is really gonna bitch at 54 cents. Its pocket change compared to other spikes such as oil, cable tv services, and cell phones"

Remember that that's coming on top of a 61 cent federal tax hike, and that the 1.15 taxes will have another nickle added by sales tax to make it $1.20 per pack. So if you have two heavy smokers in your family and between you you smoke three packs a day, that's roughly an extra hundred and ten dollars a month the government is grabbing from you simply because the minority group you belong to hasn't gotten organized enough to defend itself.

Picture if the government suddenly came in with a tax hike of a hundred dollars extra a month on your cable tv or cell phone. Think you'd bitch then?

Michael J. McFadden
Author of "Dissecting Antismokers' Brains"

These taxes will kill us more than smoking :)

Growin` yer own looks better and better all the time!