University of Minnesota students and employees could be some of the hardest hit victims of this year’s budget deficit if Gov. Tim Pawlenty follows through with his plan to make cuts in the higher education funding bill he signed into law through unallotment. Though Pawlenty casts himself as a noble guardian of the pocketbooks of Minnesota families, it would be hard to explain to a University student who sees tuition rise to 15 percent or a University employee laid off that the governor has their best interests at heart.
Let it be known, however, that our good governor would never raise taxes. He’s never shy on that argument. But what Pawlenty forgets to mention is that his fiscal philosophy forces families to pay by choking revenue from the very state institutions upon which Minnesotans rely. In this case, that institution is the state’s flagship educational and research university, which is preparing to retrench through tuition increases or firings. Testifying at the Capitol, President Bob Bruininks said that the University would have to raise tuition 15 to 18 percent or shed 500 to 750 jobs to balance its budget if Pawlenty follows through with unallotment.
The University shares some blame for showing fiscal imprudence; sending a funding request for an unnecessary Bell Museum was arrogant move. Moreover, just as the state is proposing to dig into its reserve coffers, so to should the University.
But we urge citizens hit from a potential cut to the University not to raise arms solely at the University’s administration for raising tuition or slashing jobs. Pawlenty could unilaterally cut 13 percent from the University’s state funding base, and that’s a sum that cannot be made up without raising tuition or cutting jobs. Whatever cuts the governor will make to higher education will be illustrative of whether he really is looking after Minnesota families and protecting the state’s smartest investment: education.








Serving the University of Minnesota Community since 1900
4 Comments
To comment, please login.
California Budget........
California is one of those states where it takes a two-thirds supermajority to both pass a budget and to increase taxes. The California budget has been subject of a lot of coverage over the past year, with a shortfall in the billions. A $20 billion plus shortage is currently the problem it's facing. Governor Schwarzenegger, or the Governator, put forth a few measures to the people of California to get their approval to help the state weather the shortage. They might look into a no faxing payday loan, but that wouldn't be enough money for this huge state budget shortfall. Some of the measures included a few billion in cuts, a freeze on legislative pay raises (that passed), but all tax increases were voted down, so no short term loans will be available for the California budget.
Re: California Budget........
Those voter propostions were voted down but the CA legislature earlier this year pretty much increased taxes across the board. A 1% increase in sales tax (in LA county it's now ~9.75%), roughly a 50% increase in auto registration, and a 10% increase in income tax. When looking on the proper way to run a state, California is not a good model. For all the things broken in Minnesota, I would have to say it is better than the majority of other states across the union.
Why does the U need more money?
A friend of mine that graduated last year in ME had told me about a course that includes a building energy audit with suggestions as part of the final project. In all fairness, I don't recall the course or even if it considered a senior project, so I welcome any corrections on this.
One question I have is why we have courses to audit ourselves at least with respect to the way we use energy, but those solutions aren't acted on? One of the things he mentioned was changing lightbulbs to more efficient models projected to save in the tens of thousands per year in one building...
To follow that up, CSOM is near the top of business school rankings every year, why not have those students critically evaluate different parts of the way the U works?
Maybe that is too simple, but it seems like both approaches could be used to support an otherwise unremarkable resume....
Nice. Two editorials on the
Nice. Two editorials on the same day critical of the governor. Sorry, but I need to shout: WHERE THE BLOODY HECK IN EITHER EDITORIAL DOES ANYONE DISCUSS THE FACT THAT THE DEMOCRATS IN THE LEGISLATURE DILLY-DALLIED FOR MONTHS INSTEAD OF COMING UP WITH A BUDGET???? They could have submitted and voted on a budget in February and then had plenty of time to rework them. DID THEY? No!!! We didn't even see a budget from the LEFT until the end of April. Get off your sophomoric anti-Republican soap box and get a clue.