Editor's Note: A quote in this article was incorrectly attributed to Ryan Mathre, a spokesman for Carlson School of Management, but was actually said by Johnny Thompson, Director of Strategic Communications at Carlson. The story has since been edited accordingly.
As the United States’ unemployment rate nears the double digits, faculty, staff and students await the verdict on the loss of more than 1,200 jobs at the University of Minnesota.
In response to a 7 percent decrease in state funding and $95 million in internal cuts, University President Bob Bruininks proposed cutting 1,240 jobs or about 5 percent of the University’s workforce in his 2010 budget proposal. The Board of Regents will vote on Bruininks proposal on Wednesday.
In addition to about 370 layoffs or “non-renewals,” more than 200 faculty positions will be left open and 280 staff and 160 student positions will be eliminated.
The University also offered retirement incentives to employees, which will leave about 200 positions open.
“Lost opportunities”
At the Medical School 29 people took the retirement incentive, contributing to the Medical School’s total of 126 positions left unfilled, 42 of which are faculty positions.
Senior Vice President for Health Sciences Frank Cerra said cuts are decided by the department based on empty positions, and layoffs will be made only where possible. There were 19 layoffs at the Medical School.
The way cuts are being decided “is not a strategic way to do business,” Cerra said.
With more work being done by fewer people at the already short-handed Medical School, “there will be real pain here,” Cerra, said.
Each faculty member brings in $400,000 in research grants, and there will be big losses in revenue generating potential, he said.
School of Dentistry Dean Patrick Lloyd said the dental program shares faculty with the Medical School.
“I am quite confident that the modifications they are making in staff and faculty appointments will have no impact on our program,” he said.
Lloyd said no layoffs have been announced at the School of Dentistry , but a number of staff and faculty have taken advantage of the retirement incentive option.
The Institute of Technology will also see cuts to its program through the absence of almost 25 faculty members that the school was planning to replace this year. After the University imposed a hiring freeze in January, IT decided to hold off on replacing the faculty, a task that will be suspended indefinitely.
“This essentially just means lost opportunities,” Institute of Technology Dean Steve Crouch said . “It erases all the gains we’ve made in the past ten years by expanding the faculty.”
Cuts to faculty in IT, much like the Medical School, translates to cuts for research and graduate students, Crouch said, as each faculty member brings in about $250,000 in supporting funds.
“If you do the math, that means we are not collecting about $5 million in sponsored research,” he said, adding that the loss of those funds could mean the loss of more than 100 graduate students in IT who are directly supported by the faculty garnered research funds.
At Carlson School of Management positions have been left vacant, but no layoffs have been made, said Johnny Thompson, the director of strategic communications for Carlson.
He attributes part of the lack of cuts to the increase in graduate students. Carlson graduate registrations have spiked in the last two years, up by almost 300 as of last September, according to the Office of Institutional Research.
University Libraries will also see reductions.
Library Communications Director Marlo Welshons said the large number of job vacancies will allow them to be flexible in meeting their targeted reduction, but the libraries will still see 18 staff positions cut and diminished student support. The number of student positions cut will be equivalent to the work of four full time employees.
While 160 student jobs will be cut, President Bruininks said the “last dollar” the University will cut will be in supporting students.
However, members of the AFSCME 3800 Union said that is exactly what he is doing by cutting clerical positions.
“Eliminating our positions will make it that much harder for students to focus on their academic work, because they’re going to be dealing with not getting answers to questions, not knowing who to contact,” said Cherrene Horazuk, chief steward of AFSCME Local 3800 .
She listed the Institute of Technology, Extension news service , School of Mathematics and College of Design among the departments cutting clerical staff.
Voluntary pay cuts
While cuts are being made across the board at the University, faculty and staff at the College of Design have taken their own actions of self preservation, which includes a 10 percent voluntary salary cut from five members of the school’s leadership team — including Dean Tom Fisher — to prevent widespread layoffs.
Marilyn Delong , associate dean at the College of Design, said about 30 staff and faculty at the school total are taking reductions, saving the University an estimated $115,000. Their reduction would equal about 26 days without pay for the five leadership positions.
Many are calling on Bruininks and other top administrators at the University to do the same — take a pay cut of up to 10 percent.
Phyllis Walker, president of AFSCME 3800, said University central administration should be required to take a 10 percent pay reduction, a cut that she estimates could save the University more than $7 million.
But Bruininks said “the University is not strengthened by weakening its competitive positions.”
“The University’s top administrators are not overpaid by any comparison I have seen, and many find ways to give back to the University,” he said.
Cuts across the Big Ten
The University of Minnesota is not the only Big Ten School under the pressure of slashed state budgets. Michigan State University and the University of Iowa are looking to layoffs to save depleting funds as well.
Michigan State University, who will receive about $9 million less than anticipated in state funds, is calling for a 4 percent cut budget cut in 2009-10 and 6 percent in 2010-11, most of which will be reduced through position reductions. The majority of these cuts, approximately 87 percent, will be in personnel costs impacting an estimated 590 positions. While most will be cut through vacancies or attrition, 19 percent, or about 120 jobs will be cut, according to MSU’s Web site.
The University of Iowa announced a possible $11 million layoff plan for the next budget year, which would start July 1. Tom Moore, interim University of Iowa spokesperson said that in a worst case scenario the University will see 130 cuts to filled positions across the University this fall.
Additionally, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics will lay off 130 people and leave 70 positions unfilled at in an effort to cut $45 million from the hospital’s budget, Moore said.
Bruininks’ budget and the job losses therein, will ultimately be subject to Board of Regents approval on Wednesday.









Serving the University of Minnesota Community since 1900
58 Comments
To comment, please login.
University budget axe
Why doesn'r BRUININKS just move on, his salary alone equals 8 clerical positions. His salary is rediculous nobody is worth that much money, he should be ashamed to accept it in these tough times. How can he sleep at night or rather who is he sleeping with? He could take more than a ten percent pay cut, how about 25 or 25 %?
"Nobody is worth that much
"Nobody is worth that much money?" Two words: Adrian Peterson. There aren't 8 clerks on earth that could replace what he does on the field and what he brings to the local economy. This notion that everybody is somehow worth the same amount from a monetary standpoint is just crazy. Some skills are worth more than others. That's why you can't get a $100k job bagging groceries.
Job cuts simply fuel the fire
I agree that senior administration should take cuts. At my low level, even I'd take a cut if it would preserve my job. President Bruininks, there is no argument that anyone is "overpaid" among the highest paid employees at the university - in this environment, that's a very poor argument to make. The argument should be that these are extraordinary times, which call for extraordinary measures.
The richest can always afford a cut far more than the poorest, and where will "the best and brightest" go? Sure there are some who have money to buy folks away from us, but those who would leave might have to change industries - and I would hope that people are at the U because of the mission, not because they've hit the jackpot and are getting rich. Most people that I admire at the U are here for the intellectual and educational stimulation, not the "huge" salaries. On the contrary, it seems to me that many could make far more if they went to industry! (but perhaps not at this moment in our global economy?)
I would ask the highest paid employees - the top 10% - would you lose your home if you got a 10% cut? I doubt it. But the lowest or the middle earners just might lose their home if you lay them off. Would you have to go on welfare, food stamps, declare bankruptcy, and move in with friends or family (if you even could)? The lowest and middle earners might just face those burdens.
To you, the cut would mean a less lavish vacation. A few less dinners at 5-star restaurants. A new Lexus instead of a new Mercedes. To the lower and middle income earners, it may mean survival.
Is it socialism to help people in times of great need? Is it unfair to ask the richest to give something back to the community that made them rich when that community needs them? Is it unjust to try to avoid our own contribution to the state unemployment rolls, which every one of us pays for - if we can prevent it? And where will the money come from to pay the unemployment, food stamps, and whatever else? The state is broke! Last I heard, the state wants to cut social services!
Human decency. Civilization. Christian. Buddhist. Whatever you want to call it, it is incumbent on all of us to solve this problem. Not by adding to it with layoffs, but by tightening our belts, starting at the top. Model the behaviour you want to see. Lead by example. Demonstrate your commitment to this University and it's mission. Yell from the rooftops that this is only temporary! But you can solve the problem without layoffs if you'll only share some small part of the pain with the folks at the bottom.
Bless the College of Design for having the decency to attack the problem from a human, compassionate, civilized perspective (hopefully the somewhat confusing comments about Design laying off, but then taking reductions to prevent layoffs, isn't quite accurate?) . If only the rest of "us" would take a lesson from them.
"But the lowest or the middle
"But the lowest or the middle earners just might lose their home if you lay them off."
Maybe they should have studied harder in high school or earned a more valuable degree in college. Not our problem.
Maybe not your problem,
but fortunately a lot of people don't take your selfish, shortsighted and sick viewpoint.
Most of us know people who, through no fault of their own, are now unemployed.
May you soon join their ranks, anonymous.
It is not shortsighted,
It is not shortsighted, selfish, or sick to work harder or to obtain skills both more rare in and more essential to our economy. If people don't want to lose their jobs, they need to get out ahead of the curve - I quit my job voluntarily to retrain just before the credit crunch and I've managed to nearly double my salary in a bad economy. Now, my increased taxes are going to help those in need and I'm helping to keep several local businesses afloat with my patronage. People need to stop blaming the world for their own problems - maybe then, they would see that, by improving their own situation, they can help others, too.
You rally don't seem to get it, anonymous...
"If people don't want to lose their jobs, they need to stay ahead of the curve..."
And that is exactly what many of the people at the U were doing through the Regents scholarships - some of whom, through no fault of their own, will now be laid off.
You need to get off your high horse with this nya, nya, nya attitude of "I got mine, now go get yours."
There are plenty of people out of work who are not sitting on their ass blaming the world for their problems. And if you are too sick, arrogant, or full of yourself to see this, then there really isn't much further to say...
Have a nice day. Maybe you can find some unemployed person to look down your nose at? That should cheer you up. Tell 'em it's their fault and if only they were smart like you they wouldn't be in this predicament?
Wake up.
If they had possessed skills
If they had possessed skills valuable in the private sector, they wouldn't need graduate degrees to make $50k a year.
And if the moon were made of green cheese...
"You control your own destiny..."
Been reading too much Ayn Rand, lately?
Everybody controls their own
Everybody controls their own destiny. You put yourself into any situation you are in. If you get into a car accident, you were the one who put you in the car on that day and that time. If you win the lottery, you were the one who bought the ticket. This illusion that we are all helpless is just an excuse to not take responsibility.
It is obvious that logic is not your strong point...
but could you please read and think about what you have just said:
This illusion that we are all helpless is just an excuse to not take responsibility.
This is a straw man argument if there ever was one. Nobody said anything about all of us being helpless... But to claim that it is someone's responsibility that they won the lottery or got in an automobile accident is just, ah, stupid, I'm sorry to say.
If you have to have the last word, the mike's yours. Clearly you are not interested in any sort of rational discussion.
Ciao, ciao, bambino.
"But to claim that it is
"But to claim that it is someone's responsibility that they... got in an automobile accident is just, ah, stupid, I'm sorry to say."
You clearly don't work in insurance.
Whose fault?
Assuming your warrant is based on a grand spectrum, will you blame yourself for not securing the proper resources to leave planet Earth is nailed with a cataklysmic asteroid? I mean, you chose to live here and not on a Mars colony, correct? By the way, my views are towards your extreme, but beware that maintaining such an extreme view as yours is dangerous. I feel I do virtually everything to myself, but there are some events that even you can't control.
Space, the final frontier...
Mars colonies do not exist at the moment. Expecting a person to have both the vast technical knowledge and monetary resources required to emigrate to another planet is a far cry from expecting them to know that there is crash potential every time they start their car. There are some things beyond our control - cancer, genetic defects, asteroids, etc. However, many things that people treat as uncontrollable are anything but. When there is a hurricane, do you feel bad for the people with wrecked homes? I don't - they chose to live on the beach and, in doing so, implicitly accepted the risks associated. Analogous situations are everywhere, especially in the housing and job markets right now.
I agree with all the above.
I agree with all the above. But using your prior arguments, it is not impossible, but highly improbable, to exit Earth to avoid an asteroid impact. Thus, you would make a series of choices that would or would not allow you to leave Earth. I like to assume that there IS available technology to inhabit Mars, it's just we won't know about it for awhile. So assuming that I am right with this, it would be your choice whether or not to avoid destruction because you control your destiny. The money and opportunity are there for the taking, so if you die from the impact when a colony exists, it's your fault. Again, assume there would be one in operation.
If a base existed and you
If a base existed and you still died in the impact, it would be your failure for not out-foxing the rest of humanity for one of the available spots in the escape pod.
My points may be sick and
My points may be sick and short sighted, but they work for me. Did I mention I'm selfish too?
My momma says I'm special.
You've finally looked in the mirror?
It's hard, I know...
You know because you've just
You know because you've just recently discovered that you're a troll?
Check out my blog of all blogs!
Everybody is selfish to some
Everybody is selfish to some degree.
You do realize that you're
You do realize that you're expendable, right? No matter who you are, or how smart or skilled you are - you are expendable. All of us are. So look down on the people who are suffering all you want, but try to hold on to the knowledge that you could be next. No plans are foolproof.
(This comment is brought to you by someone who is likely to increase her salary during this recession due to being in the right place at the right time.)
Sure, people are all
Sure, people are all technically expendable - but some are much, much harder to replace than others. For example, when Michael Jordan retired, the Chicago Bulls were hard-pressed to replace the void he left. They lost more than half of their games over the next five years. The U will not end up at the bottom of the academic world due to the departure of some low-level employees working unskilled, clerical jobs. Those workers need to make themselves more indispensable or learn to play a new sport.
Wise words from a highly successful guy:
"The man who complains about the way the ball bounces is likely the one who dropped it."
-Lou Holtz
Anonymous arrogance
To Anonymous - Post your name so folks can call you for educational and career advice.
You are failing to recognize that there all all kinds of people and all kinds of jobs. Not everyone gets to be an astronaut or a hedge fund manager - there are only so many of those jobs to be found and not everyone has the talent or ability to get there.
We need janitors, office staff, managers, faculty, food service workers, university presidents, and on and on. If all those folks go out and get the education that will allow them to get that great high-paying job, who will fill their spot? And they might just compete with you for your great new job and push you out. Then you'll have to go back to school again to find the next great opportunity.
Plenty of very intelligent and highly educated people are looking for work right now. They might benefit from your advice if you'd be so good as to share.
"not everyone has the talent
"not everyone has the talent or ability" (i.e. There will always be people who get paid less or who get laid off, no matter how much your heart bleeds for them.)
"If all those folks go out and get the education that will allow them to get that great high-paying job, who will fill their spot?" (immigrants, ex-cons, & high school students)
"And they might just compete with you for your great new job and push you out." (Unlikely, as I would have more experience than them).
"Then you'll have to go back to school again to find the next great opportunity." (God, I hope not. I don't think I could survive one more minute of the U's mediocre services.)
I thought the University's
I thought the University's "competitive positions" were its teachers and researchers - not its central administration.
Follow
the money...
Past increases
If I remember correctly, President Bruininks received at $25,000 raise recently. It think it was to equalize his salary with that of other Big 10 Universities... Don't you think he could give that back now? Or consider the 13 Vice-Presidents... even if they only received a 3% raise last year, that would equal around $6000. Even small percentage cuts at the higher levels could save jobs elsewhere... People who work hard and have had good reviews are taking cuts and being non-renewed. People who liked their jobs and didn't know they were supposed to get a higher degree so they could get tenure or be college presidents to save their jobs. Really... putting people down because they were unlucky enough to be laid off? It has nothing to do about skills, talent or work, just if they have a handy budget line to cut!
OurCEO's compensation
is ca $740K p.a. Nuf' said.
skills + experience +
skills + experience + responsibilities = money
more skills + more experience + more responsibilities = more money
Your equations have a little problem...
The president of the US has more experience and more responsibilities than the president of the University of Minnesota and yet he makes less money...
You must be a techie with an algebra problem?
He also gets the use of a
He also gets the use of a customized 747 and a fleet of helicopters. He gets free room & board. He gets a lifetime of secret service protection. He's guaranteed to make hundreds of thousands, if not millions on book deals and appearances after his term has expired. All in all, the Prez gets quite a bit more than a university president, it's just not all included as part of his check.
Steen seems to be handing you your head on a plate...
and I don't want to gang up.
Have a nice day.
Steen probably makes $28k a
Steen probably makes $28k a year and buses to work. I'm not intimidated.
!
That's beautiful! You are impressively and insightfully wrong (not a surprise) - although I think busing to work is actually a smart way to commute. And you shouldn't be intimidated. Really, I won't bite. But I'll call you on your ignorance and arrogance. Funny joke - what's the difference between ignorance and arrogance? I don't know and I don't care. Too many people fit this description...
You aren't necessarily right just because you think you're right! You merely have your own opinion. And are you old enough to know what they say about opinions, I hope? They're like a$$h*les. Everyone has one. But facts are a different story - although there is also that other old saw about "lies, damn lies, and statistics."
Buses are for poor people and
Buses are for poor people and losers that don't like to take the reins. They're also slower than bicycles, which is ridiculous.
riding the bus is smart financially
No. I work at the U of M where there are 75,000 students, faculty, and staff all fighting for 20,000 parking spots. Stupid is fighting traffic every morning to park in your $100 a month parking spot when you could be paying $50 a month to ride the bus. It's about being fiscally smart, something I would assume a conservative like you pretends to know about.
Right on bus rider...
The guy's clearly an ignoramus. Buses are for losers? What a jerk.
It's true. You'll never see a
It's true. You'll never see a Fortune 500 CEO on a city bus unless it's for a photo op. Conversely, you'll also never see a drunk hobo driving a Bentley to stay warm in the winter.
actually they've reduced
actually they've reduced secret service protection to last only 10 years after the presidential term ends. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/3056.html
It would still cost a fortune
It would still cost a fortune for that service.
no doubt. that's why when
no doubt. that's why when people piss and moan about the trips Obama is taking with his family at the so called "expense of the taxpayer" they should realize that the presidential expenditure budget allows for a per year $50,000 monthly expense account, a $100,000 non-taxable travel account and $19,000 for entertainment. It's already part of the compensation package. Anything beyond that must come from the salary the president makes which at roughly $400,000/yr (keep in mind he has no other bills) shouldn't be to much of a problem
too* I gotta correct that
too* I gotta correct that just in case people want to attack my spelling since the facts are indisputable.
Actually, the President gets
Actually, the President gets free room but not free board; Presidents pay for their food.
What about all of the times
What about all of the times he entertains foreign dignitaries? I doubt he picks up the tab for that or the food on Air Force 1. He's probably just responsible for cereal and snacks.
Here's some "logic" based on
Here's some "logic" based on the anonymous comment "you obviously don't work in insurance"
If you're driving home and get creamed by a drunk driver, it's your fault for getting in the car and driving.
If you get food poisoning from a 5-star restaurant, it's your fault for eating at a place that hires illegal aliens to wash the dishes. And it's your fault they hired the illegal alien.
If you get skin cancer, it's your fault for going outside.
As you may know, insurance companies don't actually work on the "you're in good hands" model... Shouldn't need to explain that to you, right?
And bad things happen to good people - life is not fair, but people can be if they choose to be. But it is a choice if your eyes are open wide enough to see it.
re: "skills + experience + responsibilities = money
more skills + more experience + more responsibilities = more money"
For example, John Thain, Bernie Madoff, Enron, Worldcom, Adelphia, AIG, etc... At some point, civility and integrity need to be injected into any situation or business decision. There are plenty or Randian parasites and con artists out there who preach the personal responsibility meme. And while personal responsibility is paramount, it is only as good as the ethical character of any given individual. A crook is a crook, white collar or blue. But it's the white collar crooks who "make more money" for their "skills."
You want to paint life in black and white, but it's lived in brilliant color. There aren't just shades of gray, there are infinite hues of every imaginable color.
And none of this addresses the primary question - how did we get to this point? Wait - I seem to remember - it's the liberals' fault. Right?
If you didn't get in the car
If you didn't get in the car and drive to that place at that exact time, you wouldn't have been in an accident. The same is true with the restaurant - if you didn't eat there, you wouldn't have gotten sick. Sure, it's still mostly the fault of the drunk driver and the dishwasher, but you are the key that facilitates the disaster. Without your cooperation, neither problem would have presented itself. As for cancer, that is one of the few things completely uncontrollable. You could be totally healthy and suddenly get it at age 35.
In response to your comments about the criminal investors, I suppose you are one of those folks that thinks anyone making more than $___ (fill in blank) dollars is a criminal. These people are the exception to the rule. Not every poor person is a criminal, either.
p.s. It's not anybody's fault in particular. The economy comes and goes in cycles that, despite our best efforts, nobody can control. S*** happens.
Not our best efforts at all
I think that if someone makes a boatload of money honestly, more power to them! I'll bet they'll donate a bunch of money to some worthy causes and get a building named after them!
I seem to detect a hint of predisposition in your worldview? You aren't the key, you are merely the random element in a constantly changing puzzle. Ah, well, we are predestined to disagree. If you had more information, you might recognize that many things can be prevented, avoided, or managed more effectively. Of course, if I were better informed, I'd be embarking on a new career where I'd be doubling or tripling my salary! But I actually like the U and admire the work being done here - even though, like any organization anywhere, it is imperfect.
Hopefully you'll let me know how you have excelled in your new line of work, and have done it with honesty and integrity rather than deception and subterfuge. I'll watch for an email from you...
This idiot is not Pangloss
not even Pangloss is this stupid...
When you drive somewhere it's
When you drive somewhere it's not your fault that you are where you drove? You must be one of those religious types. Praise Jeebus!