Campus

University police prepare for on-campus football

The University will implement a breathalyzer system to deter alcohol offenders.
Published: 07/14/2009
Advertisement

When the TCF Bank Stadium opens in less than two months, the University of Minnesota plans to implement a system to deter alcohol-related problems by administering breathalyzers to prior offenders.

The program, called “Check BAC” — as in blood alcohol content — is just one of the many steps the University and police are taking to prepare for the inevitable trouble that will come with bringing football back to campus. University police have been travelling around the Big Ten looking for advice on alcohol enforcement and traffic control to get ready.

Check BAC is modeled after a University of Wisconsin-Madison program. If a student is caught for underage consumption or ejected from the stadium for public intoxication, they are automatically enrolled in the program. If the student comes back to a game that same season, they will be required to provide a breath sample on a portable breath tester.

If they are underage and have alcohol in their system, they will not be allowed entry into the game. Even if they are of age, depending on their level on intoxication, they might not be admitted into the stadium.

The University has also created specific tailgating rules that outline where and how tailgating will be acceptable. Earlier this year the University went to the state Legislature hoping to gain authority to create and enforce their own criminal ordinances, which would allow University police to create specific laws that pertain to tailgating.

The bill was not passed, so any violations of the University’s tailgating rules will be a civil matter and will involve the Office for Student Conduct and Academic Integrity for University students.

University police are meeting weekly with the OSCAI, as well as with food vendors, Parking and Transportation Services , the Department of Emergency Management and athletics department personnel to prepare for issues inside and immediately outside of the stadium.

Logistics and outside help

Multiple meetings are happening on a daily basis as University police try to hear and attend to concerns from various University departments and local businesses.

University Police Chief Greg Hestness said the logistical planning behind the stadium is taking up about 75 percent of his time.

University police have hired dozens of police officers from more than 20 other jurisdictions to help out on a part-time basis, in addition to their own 46 full-time officers, bringing the total number of game-day police to about 100.

Though many who will be working the games this fall have worked Gophers games at the Metrodome, all officers working at the new stadium will have to go through orientation sessions in late July and early August to become familiar with the stadium, as well as how the logistics of tailgating and traffic control will work.

Minneapolis police spokesman Sgt. Jesse Garcia said the stadium being on campus will mean less traffic downtown.

“There will be an increased awareness for the 2nd precinct because of potentially more tailgating on game days,” Garcia said. “But that’s something we’re working pretty closely with the UMPD to coordinate.”

University Police Deputy Chief Chuck Miner said they are used to dealing with 50,000-plus fans, but the new stadium will bring a new culture and experience to everyone involved on game day.

“We’ve learned from our Big Ten peers to just do it right from the start,” Miner said. “Other institutions have had problems where a culture developed of not following the rules. We can’t let things get out of control from the start.”

For example, Ohio State University experienced mini-riots on a game-by-game basis in the early 2000s. University police visited OSU last year when they played Minnesota and looked at how the school’s police handled issues such as alcohol enforcement, traffic control and homeland security as part of the game day operation.

With uniforms still being ordered, officers still being trained and some plans still in the works, Miner is certain about one thing: “We’re looking forward to getting the first game behind us.”

130 Comments

The Minnesota Daily wants to host a forum for discussion regarding issues and stories regarding the University of Minnesota and surrounding communities. However, the online comments should not be used to threaten or defame. This is a place for people to be heard, and want to contribute to discussion. Those who persist to use expletives, inappropriate, racist, defamatory or abusive postings risk losing the privilege to post.

To comment, please login.

I miss the dome already. This place sounds like it's being run by the fun police.

that the fun police should run Fun Bobby's place...

More name-calling from Bill Gleason. You stay classy.

as classy does...

http://bit.ly/1ahmiv

Or, just do a search on "fun Bobby" on the daily web site.

Using a name out of spite is not the same as using it for satire. Gleason's writing has a bitter quality to it. The Daily's does not.

some of it doesn't.

Have a look at this. Is this OK, or is it mean-spirited?

http://bit.ly/17Bheu

Have a nice day! (You seem bitter?)

Never click unsolicited links on the internet. (could be malware)

good anti-virus software and malware protection. It is available for free, if you are a U community member, on the U's website. You can also get some pretty good stuff for free online. Kind of dangerous to use the web without it. Lots of "unsolicited links" out there...

There is no program on earth that can scan for and eliminate all possible threats. Virus and spyware authors are always one step ahead. Your best bets are to avoid using Microsoft Windows & IE and to exercise sound judgment online. If a stranger posts an unfamiliar link anonymously, clicking it would not be the best idea, especially if the stranger keeps prodding you to do so.

or Ubuntu or some other flavor of Unix/Linux. Both options are a lot safer than Windoze... You might want to have a look on Twitter and see all the bitly links. Pretty common. And you have no idea where they will lead. If you are only going to click on "safe" links, you aren't going to be able to follow up much on Twitter. But of course you might not want to...

Twitter isn't much of a threat. If there are links within a Twitter post, THEY could be trouble. I personally wouldn't bother with either. Twitter is just a fad created by the lack of adult participation on Facebook. Fbook has had a similar feature for years.

At a birthday gathering Saturday night in Dinkytown, near the Minneapolis campus of the University of Minnesota, I witnessed several hours of a full-blown riot half a block down the street at Seventh Street and 15th Avenue. computer science degree AND Online Nutrition degree

That picture is soooo badass. Looks like a promo poster for a good summer action flick

The UMPD should check passports, too. They could help stem illegal immigration.

They'd loose 1/4 of their student population if they did that...but then again, it might free up almost all of the scholarship money...

Hundreds of people were gathered in the street. People were standing on cars, breaking windows and denting the sides. Shouting, crowd chanting, physical fights and breaking bottles could be heard constantly. There were multiple fires in the street. This all had been occurring before I left the scene at about 11 p.m. Online Performing Arts degree AND Visual Communication degree AND health science school

I think they should add strip searches to the new security measures. Nothing catches a flask like a peek at "the goods!"

I think it is great that the stadium is alcohol free. And I give hats off to the police officers
and learning to control issues before they happen. This will make the entire experience a good one. GOOD JOB!

Minnesotans have such perverse views on alcohol. How do you reconcile your views with the fact that Europeans drink much younger and yet still turn out to be fine adults?

No kidding, right? Many students' parents could at 18 when they were in college, but the Minnesotans were all uptight about it back then, too.

Uhhh, it's not just Minnesotans who feel that way.

30 states allowed 18 year-olds to drink before the National Minimum Drinking Age Act forced them to change under threat of reduced highway funds. Minnesota had one of the highest drinking ages prior to 1984.

Obviously, this was a post by the Marcy Holmes Neighborhood Association or Melissa Bean, they hate students, they want to control the lives of students, and take all their money.

Lameass.

Where were all of these anti-alcohol crusaders before the stadium was built? If they had spoken up sooner, I wouldn't have bothered to buy tickets for this season. I have no desire to spend my hard earned dollars to see the Goophers blow the big games if I'm going to be deprived of some way to dull the heartache. "There's always next season" stopped working for me years ago. At least the SEC is still fun to watch.

I agree. Now, I'm just waiting for all of the ppl to come here and bash you for not being able to get through a game without having a drink.

Do they take tickets back?

Frankly I'd rather just be drunk and watch it on tv. It's football for Christ's sake. Without the combination of alcohol and a hometeam, it just isn't worth it.

Besides, we are going to be FREEEEEZING! It's outdoors! and i know it has snowed during gameseason before.

Eff that. >:(

I personally don't care whether they serve alcohol at the stadium because I will never go to a game, but why is the issue of alcohol at the new stadium being brought up so close to the oncoming season? Couldn't this have been hashed out long before ticket sales started? These last-minute decisions are only serving to anger a great deal of people (evidenced by the comments to all of the alcohol related articles).

the subject has been on the table for quite some time. The Regents more than a year ago okayed a plan where alcohol would be sold in premium seating only to those of age, not in general seating. This annoyed the legislature who wanted beer purchase allowed for all of age, or beer for no one. They passed a law recently, which the governor signed, that stipulated either all or none. The U chose the no alcohol option. This is an attempt at a sanitized version without any finger pointing.

I'm not sure who gets the blame. But the sequence of events above is the reason for the appearance of a fast shuffle.

As one of the Regents - Hunter - pointed out, you couldn't buy a beer in Memorial Stadium, so obviously lack of beer is no bar to football being played. As I understand it the Gophers actually had some good football teams in a beer free Memorial stadium. Or is that just an urban legend?

Why wasn't any of this information sent out with the ticket information?

Also, just so you know - a lack of beer won't make us win any more than an NFL-caliber field did. We haven't been legitimately good since the 50s. The success during the 1960s was mostly the result of southern, black recruiting. Teams intentionally ignored some of the best available players due to race and we swept them up. That's not exactly what I call a sound way to build a program. It was more of a short-term solution to hanging effigies in Warmath's yard. Unless this stadium proves to be a recruiting magnet, we're going to be the Minnesota Golden Heartbreakers for the foreseeable future.

Please read what I said a little more carefully. I never claimed that lack of beer made the team great or at least better than now. All I did was point out that you couldn't buy a beer in Memorial stadium. Therefore it isn't NECESSARY to have beer to be a good football team. If one has no beer, one can still be lousy. We may see a demonstration of this fact shortly...

"As I understand it the Gophers actually had some good football teams in a beer free Memorial stadium." Why say something like that if you weren't trying to suggest a relationship?

They didn't sell Klondikes in Memorial stadium either. Does this mean that if we continue not selling Klondikes in TCF that we will have a good team? I don't get your point.

All I'm saying that lack of beer is not an obstacle to having a good team. Lack of beer does not make a good team. Coaching and the players do.

Besides, the people on the team are not drinking the beer, presumably.

Sorry, but I don't think we are connecting on this point

Nobody said anything about winning in relation to beer until you brought it up. The comment this tangent started on was about the relative lack of information on alcohol presented before tickets were sold. Nobody thinks beer will make the team better. A lot of people will enjoy the games more with it, though.

"I personally don't care whether they serve alcohol at the stadium because I will never go to a game, but why is the issue of alcohol at the new stadium being brought up so close to the oncoming season?"

Someone then proceeded to answer the question.

I think that too much has been made over the alcohol business. It is not necessary to have alcohol in the Stadium to have a good football team. I am glad you are (finally) acknowledging this fact.

With respect to beer making gopher games more enjoyable: dental surgery can be done without anaesthesia, but usually it is administered before the operation. I'd suggest you stop at Sterbs for a nice drink before and after the game, if you are of age. Just one, though. Perhaps you could go to the chardonnay reception at Eastcliff, but I understand you have to be a high roller. And make sure you don't get into your car until sober or else take a taxi.

We need to keep the few true gopher fans we have alive!

Cheers!

Having one drink defeats the purpose of drinking alcohol because alcohol tastes worse than pretty much every other beverage ever conceived by mankind. Anybody saying they only drink for the flavor is a liar. Everybody would drink O'Douls and sparkling grape juice if they enjoyed only the flavor. They like the effects, too.

I wonder if they'll serve milk in the stadium. We could plan a "gallon challenge." It'd be way fun with a crowd like that.

You will recall that one of the siren calls of the Dome was the supposedly fast indoor track that would lure the speedsters from down South who would make the Gopher's great. Also, it would be weatherproof. One Lou Holtz and Sir Sid peddled this line. U Admins ate it up. Somehow it didn't happen. Now all of a sudden "the fans" demand a return of football to campus? And the admin? Well, what the hell - sure they grudgingly took the money...

So we will see.

On a cold rainy or snowy Saturday with a lousy team will TCF stadium be full?

Time will tell... But what possible excuse will there be now? Sorry, our high academic standards aren't going to do it. Every one else is cheating and we're not? That won't work either.

Lou Holtz wasn't the coach when they moved. He didn't come here until 1984, two years later. Joe Salem was in charge at the time of the move. If Holtz advocated for the Dome after his arrival, it was probably to stay at a facility far superior to a obsolete, crumbling stadium.

The university administrators didn't "eat it up" like they were spoon fed, either. AD Paul Giel was one of the major proponents from the start and the president was hamstrung by the expensive renovations to Eastcliff, effectively keeping him from lobbying for a renovation of Memorial.

Lou did indeed blather about the attractiveness of the Dome in recruiting fast Southerners.

You do remember how he used Ricky Foggie.

You are correct that former president Ken Keller had his own problems. And he was never a football guy. What was spent on Eastcliff was a drop in the bucket compared to what it would have cost to redo the statdium at that time. And you could argue that fixing up Estcliff was important. Our president can now use it for pre- and post-game chardonnay parties It was the a-word that got him. As far as focusing on doing less and doing it very well, perhaps he was right?

Paul Giel WAS in the administration and he, together with the big cigars and Sir Sid, was a major force in the move.

That's all - as they say - water over the dam at this point. Except I'd hope we would learn something from this.

It is a matter of priorities and taking the long-term view. Are we an educational institution or are we going to whine and complain about a lousy football team? Why does NU every once in a while come up with a decent team? Is Indiana a terrible school because they don't do that well in football? I think we all know the answers to these questions.

Let's support the gophers win or lose. And let's be proud of the achievements of our scholar-athletes, including academic achievements. Given the time that these folks spend on athletic pursuits, it is a wonder that any of them graduate. How about remembering this when recruiting? I am getting a little tired of seeing highly touted recruits turning out to be academic non-qualifers. Put a good, well-coached, team on the field. That's all I ask. How does John Gagliardi do it? How does Mike Grant?

GO GOPHERS!

NU had a decent team in the mid 90s because it circumvented NCAA recruiting rules. The coach got in hot water later for that. The 'Cats were good again in the early 00s because they were early adopters of the spread. They were also early adopters of the half-empty stadium and free ticket giveaways. They also set the record for longest D-1 losing streak in the early 80s. The fans rushed the field, cheering "We're the worst! We're the worst!" Sounds like a great team to watch.

Indiana is a terrible school. I wouldn't go there if you paid me. I'd much rather go to any of the other schools in the conference or even a school in another conference. Maybe if I were a basketball fan, I would think differently.

Gagliardi doesn't compete at our level. Even a mediocre Gopher team could utterly SMOKE the walk-ons at St. John's. We need an Urban Meyer to make our team good. Good teams attract both better players and better student athletes, but you need a rockin' coach to turn average players into the 1993 Badgers.

And how many times has NU been to the Rose Bowl recently?

And the Gophers?

And the graduation rate of NU football players is?

And the Gophers?

Indiana is a terrible school? Ah, is this according to graduation rate? Their music school? Their average debt at graduation? What are your criteria for a terrible school?

Whether the Gophers could beat St. Johns is totally irrelevant. St. Johns competes at THEIR level and the Gophers don't. That's a fact. I hope that this situation improves, but I am worried.

Wake up and sniff the Cheese, or the Pig, or the Lion, or even the Wildcats...

Time to go to work on this?

Recently? The last one was over a decade ago. That's eons ago in sports.

And when was the last time the Gophers were in the Rose Bowl?

If ten years ago is eons, then how about

2008 - 1962 = ah, by my arithmetic: 46 years.

The way you count, that was millenia?

Oh and how has the Gophers record been LATELY compared to NU? Overall, last two years, or? If you live in the present, I am afraid NU is outdoing us despite having a tiny school and rather, shall we say, a little higher admission standards.

Your'e really scratchin' pal. Why don't you just 'fess up? You really don't want to go down this road. Let's admit we have trouble and try to fix it. Denial isn't going to work this time.

I think your dog died. Time to get a new one?

Also eons ago, but if you're counting eons, we're clearly superior to NU - 6 national titles to 0. If you're counting the last two years, that's a pretty even comparison. NU won 10 games, the U won 8. Though the U's record is worse over that time, the '07 season featured a handful of games that came down to single, high-risk plays. Some of NU's wins were single score wins, as well. The difference between the two teams could have been as little as one player in a key position.

I still can't believe we're comparing the U to NU. This is why the football team never gets any better. Instead of shooting for lofty goals, we aim low. Northwestern has won less than 40% of its games since 1981. NU fans actually got excited when they set the record for most consecutive losses. Why are we aiming for that?!?

Give me a break.

So the explanation for our poor football playing is because we are aiming low trying to be better than Northwestern. Lord, love a duck, you really are desperate.

The fact is that in recent years - which is what most of the gopher faithful care about - Northwestern has outplayed us. It is a fact, Jack. And Northwestern is a small school with, shall we say, academic standards. They lead the BigTen in graduation rates.

So what do you propose to do about it, genius. Let's hear your solutions? New coach? check, we've done that plenty of times... New stadium? Check, that too. Lower our academic standards? Kind of hard. Can't go lower. Highly touted recruits can't qualify academically. Raise our academic standards? Now there's a novel concept.

But seriously, what do you suggest?

And if you don't have any reasonable suggestions, maybe you should just go away and not waste any more time?

You must not have ever visited fireglenmason.com when it was still around. There were dozens of comments every day proclaiming that Gopher football was never going to get any better than it was in the early 00s because, after all, we ARE Minnesota. I don't think we will ever be truly good because people at this school are totally satisfied with mediocrity. This satisfaction is evident all over campus in everything the U does. On top of that, this notion that we can just start recruiting players that are both better athletes and better students, out of the blue, demonstrates a complete lack of knowledge of how college football recruiting works. You need to demonstrate potential before landing the best recruits. Demonstrating potential usually requires gifted athletes of questionable academic caliber because they are easier to find than athletic Rhodes Scholars.

I will not concede that Northwestern is even marginally better than we are because they are not. NU v Minnesota 08: NU won with 12 seconds left due to an interception returned for a TD. The game was tied for almost two full quarters. NU v Minnesota 07: NU won in double overtime because we failed at a two point conversion. Minnesota, a 1-11 team, led for 3 quarters and remained tied for two more. NU is clearly superior. OBVIOUSLY. NU v Minnesota 04: Minnesota won 43-17. NU v Minnesota 03: Minnesota won 42-17. NU v Minnesota 02: Minnesota won by a field goal. 01 and 00: NU won by last minute Hail Mary passes. With the exception of 02 and 03, all of these games could have easily gone the other way if last-minute desperation plays had succeeded or failed. Declaring that one team is clearly better would be ridiculous.

Denial is not just a river in Egypt.

1 and 11 - fuggedabout it. But, but, but... He was a new coach, the cupboard was bare...

Get real. Every team in the BigTen would go to the Rose Bowl every year, if only... Are you so full of bile and spleen that you are unwilling to admit that NU does a hell of a job with what they've got unlike some teams we know (and love)?

Grow up.

And your whining in the first paragraph is just ludicrous. How long do you think this kind of excuse is going to sell? Thirty years? Forty years?

Complete lack of knowledge about how college football recruiting works? Yeah we're all just stupid and geniuses like you know THE WAY. And it is?

http://bit.ly/CQKSh

Denial is a stupid pun that got old about 40 years ago.

NU is a joke, which is why we have played them for homecoming more than any other team. They were one two-point conversion away from losing to a 1-11 team with a new coach and minus about 10 starters from the previous year. There should be NO pride from that win.

I stand by my statements about the mediocre attitudes around here. Your entire blog is evidence of my correctness on this matter. Everything here is half-assed. Everything. The U has a loser mentality.

The denial business is a helluva lot older than 40 years - ask Mark Twain. Unfortunately, it is totally appropriate for folks like you.

One minute you are here telling us that the Gophs are as good as NU and the next you are whining that NU should take no pride in beating a 1-11 team. Do you know how foolish this looks? I guess not.

Some of us are making an effort to improve things around here, hard as that might be for a smug loser like you to understand. So convinced of the "correctness of your position" whatever that is? Look in the mirror. It is a question of priorities: education, research, sports. Since we are short of money, some behavioral changes are going to have to take place around here. I understand there are good blogs on the subject. Why don't you make some comments there?

Are would you rather just continue to just sit in the corner and take potshots?

Have a nice day. The conversation is over.

this is my first comment on this article but fyi trying to end a discussion with the last word by saying THIS CONVERSATION IS OVER is a real lame thing to do and despite saying that it's over I can almost guarantee that you'll keep it going if someone keeps poking.