Campus

Pawlenty and Gingrich talk healthcare at U

They discussed how to reform healthcare in Minnesota and nationally.
Published: 07/15/2009
Advertisement

Gov. Tim Pawlenty and former House Speaker Newt Gingrich talked about the future of healthcare Wednesday at the University of Minnesota’s McNamara Alumni Center.

They spoke to an audience of about 150 at a workshop titled “Creating a 21st Century Intelligent Health System in Minnesota,” hosted by the Center for Health Information.

Pawlenty called the nation’s healthcare system “fundamentally broken,” and said reform should come through consumers paying for quality of care, and correcting medical malpractice.

Both speakers critiqued the 1,000 page proposal released by the Obama Administration Tuesday, which would reduce the number of uninsured by 37 million and cost about $1 trillion dollars over 10 years.

Pawlenty said if national reform is centered on price, Minnesota would get the short end of the stick because it has one of the most efficient systems in the nation.

Gingrich said the number one word to describe the proposal is “disappointing.” He called it a “1970 socialized medical model brought up 30 years later.” He said the proposal was all about control, and the bill created 31 new agencies, but lacked innovation.

Both speakers said Obama’s reform bill should be stalled. Gingrich said as time goes on it would be tougher to pass it through the Legislature.

Gingrich also shared Pawlenty’s motto that it is unnecessary to raise taxes. He said if healthcare payments were aligned with value and “we go after the crooks” (people committing medical malpractice), there would be almost enough money to pay for universal coverage.

He gave the example of five pizza parlors that were claiming to treat HIV/AIDS to collect coverage as an example of people abusing the system.

Frank Cerra, senior vice president for health sciences and dean of the Medical School, also said there is no need for new money to enter the healthcare system. He said the way doctors are paid needs to change and nurses could be better utilized. Eliminating fraud in service programs like Medicare and Medicaid could also save money, Cerra said.

Human service programs were also criticized at the state level, as Pawlenty said programs like General Assistance Medical Care were “designed on the heels of others,” and are “now imploding.”

13 Comments

The Minnesota Daily wants to host a forum for discussion regarding issues and stories regarding the University of Minnesota and surrounding communities. However, the online comments should not be used to threaten or defame. This is a place for people to be heard, and want to contribute to discussion. Those who persist to use expletives, inappropriate, racist, defamatory or abusive postings risk losing the privilege to post.

To comment, please login.

The examples and quotes used in this article create an incomplete picture. Saying that no new money needs to enter the health care system is true in theory, but the writer should have given more context for readers to understand this. If the current health care system were to be replaced with a single payer system (which is not what the current plan proposes) the higher taxes needed to pay for it would be offset by a rise in wages since employers would no longer need to pay for private health insurance for their employees (which is one part of an employee's compensation package). So while its true that no new money would need to enter the system, the article author makes it sound like all of this can be achieved through greater efficiency and reducing fraud, which would be nice, but unlikely.

I assume this is a news piece?

The Daily writer is merely pointing out what Gingrich, Pawlenty, and sadly Frank Cerra, said. You are right there are plenty of holes in their arguments. The Daily writer lets the reader draw their own conclusions, which is as it should be. You clearly spotted some of the flaws in reasoning of Gingrich et al.

So it is a little unfair to claim that "the author makes it sound..."

The author is reporting the news here, not making it. There is a place for the Daily to make political commentary - in the opinions section.

Congrats to the Daily for doing their job on this one.

Oh, please. The Daily's news stories are chock full of bias.

I find this post really interesting, thanks a lot for the writing!
Samples of Papers

President Barack Obama has been trying everything just to pass a comprehensive health care reform this August. American people will benefit from this health care reform since they are worrying more and more about the quality of health care that they are receiving from the government. Health care is a huge national concern. There's a lot of talk about health care reform, and the industry does need it, especially since so many people that are only after the most basic of care have to get emergency cash loans to cover something as simple as a simple antibiotics script, and a full third of the nation is without health insurance. The lead researcher for the Dartmouth Atlas of Health Care, Elliot Fisher, a practitioner for over 20 years, has pointed out that areas that spend more on health care interestingly spend more on unnecessary procedures, and have higher mortality rates. So why do we need payday cash advances for health care that is worse when more expensive?

85% of Americans have health insurance. 15% do not. Of those 15%, 4% are unable.

Obama wants to uproot an entire system that most people are admittedly happy with (89% of coverage) for 4%?! How is this common-sense thinking? Intuitively, I know that we should be trying to correct the issue for the 4% instead of overturning everything.

We do not have a "healthcare crisis" in this country. We have a health insurance problem. When I want my oil changed, I don't file a claim with my car insurance company, I pay for it out of pocket. Insurance is only for calamaties, and extreme situations. The same should be for healthcare. This would lower costs across the board, and allow those who need insurance because of calamaties in their life to get it, instead of being turned down.

Keep the government OUT.

as those who will not see...

We do not have a "healthcare crisis" in this country.

Ha, ha...

Please let me know when an oil change and care for a broken arm cost the same.

And splain to me why our infant mortality rates are so bad in comparison to Canada and most European countries. Keep ignoring the problem, maybe it will go away?

Or maybe everyone will go bankrupt from healthcare costs? Denialists like you have gotten us to the mess we're in right now. Maybe the government should keep out of the garbage hauling business and stop snow-plowing?

Go read a good Ayn Rand book.

flaw found, ayn rand has no good books.

^^ They've obviously never paid for their health care out of pocket. ^^

The information you posted about louis vuitton is so

useful, I am expecting for your next post.

A first aid attendant would determine adequacy of breathing and provide rescue breathing if necessary. Assessment of circulation is now not usually carried out for patients who are not breathing.

first aid certificate brisbane

While we hope it never happens in May the day come when you lose your job and, therefore, you also lose your health insurance. Fortunately, short-term coverage insurance (sometimes called temporary affordable health insurance) is something that can cover your health needs from the moment you lose your job until you are eligible for benefits your new employer.