Editorials

It's time to talk tuition

Amidst a stimulus smokescreen and little outcry, tuition continues to soar.
Published: 09/15/2009
Editorial Board
The beginning of the third paragraph was corrected to read: "In the fall of 2011, however, students will begin paying the full $1500 increase on top of the tuition hikes which may result from the reduction in state allocations." The "Note:" addendum was also revised to read "he is definitely not telling the whole truth."
Advertisement

This paper ran a story last Tuesday detailing the federal stimulus money which has been allocated to the University of Minnesota. The story failed to mention an essential piece of information: the funds designated to offset enormous increases in tuition will expire after next year, leaving students and families to absorb the full burden starting fall 2011.

This past legislative session the Higher Education Omnibus bill, from which the University of Minnesota receives its state funding, included $50.1 million from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) to buy down tuition increases over the next two years. Undergraduate resident tuition increased this year by $720 or 7.3%. Next year tuition is projected to increase again year by roughly $780 or 7.5%. Thanks to the ARRA, also known as the federal stimulus package, tuition payments will provisionally increase by about half that much, or $300 and $450, respectively.

In the fall of 2011, however, students will begin paying the full $1500 increase on top of the tuition hikes which may result from the reduction in state allocations. Unlike the misleading 3% increase readily touted as this year’s tuition figure, students and families should be very clear that tuition has already increased this year alone by 7.5%. While students and families don’t have to pay that yet, they will in they very near future, and it likely gets worse. A nine percent tuition increase for the 2011 academic year, entirely possible given the largely unresolved state budget crisis, would put tuition well over $12,000 for undergraduate residents. In 2000, tuition for a resident undergraduate was a mere $4,401. Oh, how very near the good ‘ol days seem.

University of Minnesota Treasurer and CFO Richard Pfutzenreuter stated that President Bruininks has made it a priority to seek more money for scholarships to help offset these increases, but he acknowledged that it would be unrealistic to expect all of the federal stimulus money to be replaced with new scholarships.

Minnesota Student Association President Paul Strain is advocating for students to become educated on the tuition issue early, so that they can have the most influence when the Fiscal Year 2012 budget is being crafted. “Student apathy is the number one way for tuition to go up.”

Paul Strain is right. Administrators don’t seem to take students, families and other critics of skyrocketing tuition seriously mostly because criticism has remained disorganized and casual. As a result, undergraduate resident tuition at the University has increased well over 150% in the last decade. Of course, during May testimony President Bruininks assured the Minnesota legislature that "We can't add very much. I don't want to burden our students and their families." Although he did admit that tuition increases are the “quickest and easiest way” to raise money for the University.

Students cannot expect this unbearable tuition situation to improve without dedicated and vocal involvement. Join your college board, join or attend the meetings of the Student Senate or the Minnesota Student Association and help address these exorbitant tuition hikes. Write letters to the editor, write the Board of Regents and other administrators. Better yet, organize, raise awareness and protest. Students were once known for their activism. Reclaim that legacy; the time for passive acceptance of inexcusable tuition hikes has passed.

Note: In "Rappin' with Robert" in the September 15, 2009 issue of the Minnesota Daily, University of Minnesota President Robert Bruininks is quoted as saying, "Student tuition increases will not exceed 3 percent this year and not exceed 4.5 percent next year." But these numbers hide their temporary nature. In fact, tuition increased by more than 7% this year and is projected to increase by 7.5% next year. The Daily Editorial Board is not calling President Bruininks a liar, but he is definitely not telling the whole truth.

7 Comments

The Minnesota Daily wants to host a forum for discussion regarding issues and stories regarding the University of Minnesota and surrounding communities. However, the online comments should not be used to threaten or defame. This is a place for people to be heard, and want to contribute to discussion. Those who persist to use expletives, inappropriate, racist, defamatory or abusive postings risk losing the privilege to post.

To comment, please login.

I think you meant your last sentence to read:

The Daily Editorial Board is not calling President Bruininks a liar, but he is definitely not telling the whole truth.

At least you're more polite than Joe Wilson...

Added later: the suggested possible correction has been made in the article.

He is as much politician as we have in downtown St. Paul and in Washington. If they only tell half of the truth, people won't get as angry when the whole truth comes out. As an added bonus, they can still tout that they never lied to us.

On a second note, why is it that politicians only talk about increases, never decreases? To raise revenue, we talk about increasing tuition. How about decreasing operational costs? A decrease in the salaries of the top administrators, perhaps? Let's talk vice presidents. How about a decrease there? In the end, the only solution that our "leaders" know is increases, unless it is a decrease in things that directly benefit students, like professors and TAs. For example, take a look at the Chemistry Department. Last I heard, a total of 33 TA positions were cut, leaving an increased burden on the remaining TAs and a decrease in student education. Meanwhile, the students and their families are seeing decreases in income (some have even experienced decreases in employment), but that is never added into the financial equation here at the U.

I’d love to discuss louis vuitton replica, but I am not sure if you really have one.

Choose, buy and shop for on sale tiffany jewelry including Tiffany & Co Silver Necklace, Pendants, Bangles, Bracelets, Earrings, Rings and Accessories
rolex replica
tiffany jewelry
tiffany jewellery
tiffany bracelets
tiffany rings
tiffany necklaces
tiffany necklece
tiffanys
tiffany accessories
bags online
backpacks

The U.S. Department of Energy had to abandon a 20-year-long algal biofuel research project in 1996 because of the relatively high cost of turning algae into fuel and low cost of petroleum. Online Psychology School AND Online Nursing degrees

Despite this, scientists and companies all over the world are trying to be the first to figure out the best ways to create algae biofuels, a discovery that Larkins thinks will eventually join with other biofuels to solve energy issues. economics degree AND biology degree AND Online accounting degree

s concerning swiss made watches ExactReplicaWatches.coms site, products and replica watches services. ExactReplicaWatches.com also uses fake swiss personal information in an replica watches release aggregate form (i.e., not high quality swiss individually attributable to you) replica watches 2009 release for its business analysis, swiss watch replicas operational, marketing and other replica watches 2009 promotional purposes. If we swiss made watches hire other companies to high quality swiss provide some best watches replica products or services on watch replica our behalf, then we watches replica will only provide those watch replica companies the personal information watches replica they need for the watches replica Identified Purposes, and we best watch replica will limit their rights watch replica to use and further watch replica disclose your personal information watch replica as appropriate in the course of their work for us. 4. Limiting the cheap replicas watches Collection of Personal Information discount rolex replicas watches ExactReplicaWatches.com limits its collection Best Replica of personal information to replica watches only that information which cheap watch is necessary for the replica watches Identified Purposes. ExactReplicaWatches.com does exact Omega replicas not direct its site discount rolex watches to, nor does it best exact replica knowingly collect any personal cheap watch information from children under cheap louis vuitton the age of thirteen. replica louis vuitton handbags When you visit the replica louis vuitton handbags ExactReplicaWatches.com web site, a replica louis vuitton handbags cookie may be placed cheap louis vuitton on your computer or replica louis vuitton handbags the cookie may be replica louis vuitton handbags read if you have replica louis vuitton handbags visited the ExactReplicaWatches.com site cheap louis vuitton previously. ExactReplicaWatches.com uses cookies replica louis vuitton handbags to allow ExactReplicaWatches.com to determine which watches replicas products and services you high replica have already purchased so replica watch that ExactReplicaWatches.com does not high quality replica watch provide redundant information to quality replica watches you, and, if you watches replicas are an ExactReplicaWatches.com affiliate, cheap replica watches store to track ExactReplicaWatches.com sales watch replicas made to customers referred high quality replica watch store by you so that watches replicas you can receive compensation under our replica uggs boots affiliate program. If you ugg boots choose to not have discount uggs boots your browser accept cookies ugg boots from the ExactReplicaWatches.com web ugg boots site, you may not ugg boots be able to view replica uggs boots all the text on buy discount uggs the screens, or to ugg boots experience a personalised visit, uggs outlet or to subscribe to certain service and product offerings on the ExactReplicaWat