Metro & State

Meters plugged to promote parks

Groups across the Twin Cities transform parking spaces into mini urban parks to celebrate Park(ing) Day.
Published: 09/20/2009
Advertisement

On Friday afternoon, under a bright fall sun, a group of University of Minnesota students sat on a soft bed of grass, enjoying a game of cribbage and a nice cold drink at a local park. The next day their grass went back to asphalt and their park will become again a place for cars.

Architecture senior Dane Steinlicht had been there since 11 a.m. with friends, laying sod in a metered parking stall outside of Breugger’s Bagels on Oak Street. The students were one of many groups across the Twin Cities taking part in an up and coming holiday known as “Park(ing) Day.”

Park(ing) Day began four years ago in San Francisco when a group of artists decided to reclaim the urban environment through transforming street-side parking into miniature parks. The group was concerned over the fact that up to 70 percent of San Francisco’s downtown outdoor space was dedicated to accommodating cars.

Since then, Park(ing) Day has grown into an international movement, celebrated every year in September.

Park(ing) Day came to the Twin Cities in 2006 and has become more structured. Troy Gallas and Colin Kloecker of Solutions Twin Cities were the organizers of this year’s Park(ing) Day .

Gallas and Kloecker, both 2005 graduates from the University’s architecture program , saw Park(ing) Day as a great opportunity.

“You can transform your city with things like this,” Kloecker said.

While Minneapolis has many parks and an expansive skyway system, Gallas believes that the city can do more to offer truly public spaces, calling many of the public spaces in Minneapolis “only ‘quasi’ public.”

What Park(ing) Day meant to do, according to Gallas, was simply to start a public dialogue on the uses of urban space.

“We are trying to draw attention to the fact that we need more green space in the city core,” he explained, “places where people can have a good time and relax. That’s what you do in a park.”

Most participants saw Park(ing) Day as a way to enjoy themselves in creative and clever ways. A lot of groups had themed parking spaces. There was a Zen Buddhism space in Dinkytown that featured a Zen garden and a 10-foot tall hanging Buddha head.

Not all spectators welcomed Park(ing) Day. Some were upset about the monopolization of prime parking locations.

“I never can find a place to park. I think we need more parking places around here,” complained Jed Booker, an audio production and engineering student at the nearby Institute of Production and Recording .

A group parked in front of the Guthrie was questioned by a security guard as they were settling into their space.

“He just wanted to know if we had permission to be there,” said Paul Neseth of the Locus architectural firm, which had the spot.

All groups received written permission from Doug Maday of Minneapolis Public Works and Transportation Services, assuring all participants that as long as they plugged the meter and didn’t do anything illegal or dangerous they had every right to be there.

The groups thought this year’s Park(ing) Day was a success and concluded their time outside with plans for next year’s event.

Wayne Yelland , also from the Locus group, thinks that if the Twin Cities could increase participation, it could reach a critical mass after which the event would be city-wide.

1 Comment

The Minnesota Daily wants to host a forum for discussion regarding issues and stories regarding the University of Minnesota and surrounding communities. However, the online comments should not be used to threaten or defame. This is a place for people to be heard, and want to contribute to discussion. Those who persist to use expletives, inappropriate, racist, defamatory or abusive postings risk losing the privilege to post.

To comment, please login.

Many experts suggest that the rise of obesity in minority and poor children is due to the lack of availability of safe park spaces in poor/minority neighborhoods. Especially as compared to the available park space for affluent whites.

So why did every one of these demonstrations named in the article take place in neighborhoods that are largely white and already have available park space? The U has the mall area and expanses of the St Paul campus. The Gutherie is pretty near Excel Energy park. (I hope I have that name correct.)

Why weren't these demonstrations held in the neighborhoods that **really** need safe public park areas- places like Northeast Minneapolis or Frogtown?

Would that be too far out of the participants comfort zone? Having a nice cushy spot on campus or downtown next to the Gutherie may have certainly made them feel better for 'opening the dialog' about parks, but those areas already have safe spaces to walk and play. These efforts should have been focused on where they're needed, not where it's convenient.