Sunday, Nov. 8, Beth El Synagogue will “proudly” present former National Security Advisor and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice as the latest luminary in its National Speaker Series. She will deliver her speech in the main sanctuary under a huge arch emblazoned with the Hebrew words for “Truth, Justice, Peace.” I wish this were an editorial cartoon. It isn’t. But those three words provide a good framework for an analysis of Rice’s government tenure.
Truth
Rice’s multiple appearances before House and Senate committees reveal a stunning lack of recall of events preceding and subsequent to Sept. 11. In a Jan. 23, 2003 New York Times op-ed, she wrote of “Iraq’s efforts to get uranium from abroad,” when she had multiple reports that the story was not true. She also attempted to prohibit Department of State employees from appearing before staff of a Congressional committee investigating this false allegation. And knowing full well the British report had been based on forged documents, she approved the infamous 16 words in President George W. Bush’s 2003 State of the Union speech about the Niger-uranium connection crucial to our invasion of Iraq.
Justice
Whether in the “justice” we have meted out or in the lack of accountability for our own perpetrators, the secretary’s record borders on criminal. She claimed the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe called Guantanamo a “model medium-security prison.” The OSCE said no such statement was made on its behalf.
On April 27, 2009, Rice said, “We did not torture anyone.” The International Committee of the Red Cross, the FBI, General Counsel to our armed services and our own Military Commission judges disagree. For example, in a Feb. 14, 2007 report, the ICRC said, “[I]n many cases, the ill-treatment to which [the detainees] were subjected while held in the CIA program, either singly or in combination, constituted torture.”
Rice claimed, “I didn’t authorize anything. I conveyed the authorization of the administration to the agency that they had policy authorizations subject to the Justice Department’s clearance.” Documents released this April suggest her involvement in the approval of waterboarding — before the “torture memos” were even written — was much greater.
Peace
As a member of the elite White House Iraq Group, Rice was at the center of the spin/lies that led up to our invasion of Iraq. As a member of the administration, Rice stirred up the greatest of unfounded fears saying, “We don’t want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud.” Now, hundreds of thousands of deaths later, she doesn’t want to take responsibility for her role. It is more than merely arguable that this war was illegal under even liberal readings of international law obligations. Rice was instrumental in ginning up support for the war with multiple misstatements, exaggerations and lies.
Rice has frequently defended her decisions with “unless you were there.” We and Beth El Synagogue leaders are there now. To give Rice a platform to justify immoral and illegal policies is to bury our heads in the sand. We are coming close to being good Germans. This is not about second-guessing, not letting go or looking backward. This is about justice; this is about not allowing the horrors of the past to continue now and in the future.
Tackling Torture at the Top, a committee of Women Against Military Madness, will be peacefully demonstrating for “Truth, Justice and Peace” at an anti-torture rally 5:15 p.m. Nov. 8 outside Beth El Synagogue. Veterans for Peace, National Lawyers Guild Minnesota and the Anti-War Committee, among others, have endorsed the demonstration. We especially welcome Beth El members who share our view and do not wish to contribute to Rice’s no-doubt extravagant fee to join us.
If interested in forming a University of Minnesota anti-torture/torture accountability group, please call 612-871-8793.
Chuck Turchick
University alumnus








Serving the University of Minnesota Community since 1900
8 Comments
To comment, please login.
This letter was going on
This letter was going on great, but then Mr. Turchick just had to go and stick a reductio ad Hitlerum into it. Mr. Turchick has probably teed off many congregants at Beth El by even comparing some dishonesty and a bit of heavy-handedness in wartime to the policies of a genocidal fanatic who deliberately marked over 6,000,000 people for extermination and then carried it out.
Yeah
Well you're definitely right. As a Jew and member of Beth El, it doesn't necessarily make me mad so see someone refer to the congragation as "good Germans", it just makes me pity the writer. Does he evn understand what he said? Allowing a private citizen to speak in a private forum is like being a good German? It would have to make some sense for it to be offensive.
Unforunately for Mr. Turchick, the (extremely liberal) congregation of Beth El is too intellectually curious to pass up this opportunity to hear Ms. Rice speak. Of course, those of us that don't think all the money she will bring in for the synagogue is worth giving her this forum plan to protest outside. I believe I speak for everyone when I say I hope your protest will be kept separate from ours.
No. That's not what makes one a "good German."
Being unwilling to see or acknowledge was has been or is being done in one's name is what makes for being a "good German." Not being willing to examine claims by a long-time British Ambassador that, while Ms. Rice was National Security Advisor, we sent detainees to countries that literally boiled prisoners. Accepting the word of a possible war criminal over the ICRC, the FBI, General Counsel to the armed services, and Military Commission judges -- all of whom said we did in fact torture people. Whom would Beth El not allow to speak in a private forum, no matter how much money it raised? Beth El's "intellectual curiousity" surely has -- and should have -- some limits. If complicity in torture is "dishonesty and a bit of heavy-handedness in wartime," I would suggest we are reading different treaties ratified by our government.
OK
I guess I just don't see why allowing her to speak is akin to complicity in war crimes. If you don't mind me avoiding the ethical issues of giving her a forum, allow me to assert this: Most of those who are willing to pay so much to see her will not approve of her controversial actions as secretary of state or national security advisor. The fact is that people want to hear her speak, and this event will certainly raise money for the synagogue.
I'm not sure where Beth El would draw the line for inviting speakers. I guess I also wish I knew.
Maybe I wasn't clear.
I never said "allowing her to speak was akin to complicity in war crimes." I am saying to characterize her actions as "dishonesty and a bit of heavy-handedness in wartime" is to fail to see her complicity in war crimes. And that is nearly indisputable. She has for all practical purposes admitted to behavior that without question is a war crime. To "proudly" -- Beth El's word -- invite her and pay her a hefty fee to speak is not to be complicit, but it is to bury one's head in the sand at her criminal activity. We should not ennoble and dignify people who do these things. "Not approv[ing] of her controversial actions" is a cop-out. Do her actions constitute war crimes is the issue. They do, and Beth El should be embarrassed and ashamed.
Condi and others set dangerous precedent!
Accountability and truthfulness are essential for our democracy to restore adherence to the international treaties that serve to prohibit nations from using torture. As former Vice President (and member of the Church Committee that addressed governmental abuses during the 1960's-70's), Walter Mondale once explained, "I've been around the federal government long enough to know that if there is a bad precedent, it's like leaving a loaded pistol on the kitchen table. You don't know who is going to pick it up and pull the trigger. There need to be consequences for violating the law."
Or as Richard Clarke opined: "I just don’t think we can let these people back into polite society and give them jobs on university boards and corporate boards and just let them pretend that nothing ever happened...."
To the words of Walter Mondale and Richard Clarke, let me just add that we should not be rewarding the former administration officials who made these serious mistakes in following Dick Cheney to "the dark side". Already George Tenet made a $4 million advance for writing his "tell-all" book and George and Laura Bush and Colin Powell go on Zig Ziglar's "speaking circuits" earning hundreds of thousands for an appearance. The lack of accountability and the monetary rewarding that's now taking place of these terrible actions are a recipe for "picking up the loaded gun" and repeating the torture experiment at some future time.
Fear and Torture
Using fear to manipulate to the point where torture is now accepted by the majority of the American people is being a "good American", just like the "good Germans" in the 1940s. We have followed Bush, Cheney, Rice, etc., into the Dark Side just for our "security". We did not look at the lies and manipulation of the truth and so we Americans have followed them into the Dark Side. We are there, but do not want to look at it, and bring justice to how we got there and turn around - for justice and truth.
bags
unctionality. These cheap replica watches bags always make you