The University of Minnesota released a draft of a new conflicts of interest policy Wednesday, a University-wide overhaul developed after multiple conflicts in the Medical School.
The new policy would tighten annual requirements for reporting outside income received by University employees and will encourage them to voluntarily disclose the information on a public Web site, University General Counsel Mark Rotenberg said.
Currently, administrators only have to report financial income up to a threshold of $6,000 per year, according to Board of Regent’s documents. In the proposed policy, there will be no threshold and employees will be required to disclose exact incomes from outside the University.
There is no cap on how much an employee can make from an outside organization, but if the number exceeds $100,000, a review is done to assess how much time the employee is committing outside the University, Mary Koppel, spokeswoman for the Academic Health Center, said.
The new policy will prohibit ghost writing on research papers and put more pressure on day-to-day conflicts such as taking complimentary “back packs and coffee mugs” from businesses, Rotenberg said. Employees would also be prohibited from endorsing products and collecting certain royalties.
Under the proposal, employees will be required to develop a conflict management plan, and deans will be held accountable for conflicts within their respective schools.
Punishment for noncompliance could range from modification of the employee’s duties to termination.
Recent financial relationships between researchers in the Medical School and businesses have increased interest in financial accountability.
In August, information surfaced that Dr. David Polly, a University spine surgeon, reportedly received more than $1 million over four years for consulting work with Medtronic, a Minneapolis-based medical technology business.
Last fall a University Medical School task force recommended changes to the school’s conflict of interest policy, according to a September report obtained by The Minnesota Daily.
The University and its medical faculty received nearly $1.5 million from drug companies between 2002 and 2004, according to consumer rights advocacy group Public Citizen.
For Rotenberg, the new policy is about balancing important connections with the private sector and the potential for conflicts to arise.
“We don’t apologize for those connections, we aren’t embarrassed by them,” Rotenberg said. “The balance the University needs to strike here is important.”
The Board of Regents audit committee will be briefed on the proposed policy Thursday, but the regents will not take a vote on the matter. The President’s policy committee will make a final approval after an input period for faculty and staff.
That process could take a few weeks. Rotenberg said he hopes to have a final policy in place before spring.








Serving the University of Minnesota Community since 1900
7 Comments
To comment, please login.
to faculty?
I don't think so...
Why is this going to the Regents before being distributed to faculty, all faculty?
So now we'll get a chance for input and the decision will be made, by whom?
Business as usual...
William B. Gleason
Medical School Faculty
Draft Released
Where can it be found if it has been released?
Good question
I got my copy of the draft from the press. Apparently Mr. Rosenberg had a press conference where it was distributed yesterday. My emailed request to him directly has not yet been answered.
This is a pretty sad commentary on the way the Morrill Hall Crowd tries to engage with ordinary faculty and staff. Remember the next time you hear about how much the administration is in favor of faculty engagement and consultation.
No doubt it will eventually be made available to all of the university community - you know, the ones to whom the policy will apply...
A copy (pdf) of the draft of the new COI policy
is available for download (1.5 Mb) at:
http://blog.lib.umn.edu/bgleason/pt/2009/11/draft_of_conflict_of_interes...
This is not the way you should have to get it!
Bill Gleason
U of M faculty (med school) and alum
Permission to Publish?
This article says that faculty will be required to disclose their outside income, and that that info will be published on a website that anyone can access.
But after reading the draft, I'm not so sure about that. It's a little legalistic, but it suggests that faculty will be asked for permission to make public their outside income.
Anyone else get that sense?
-Christopher Loren Thompson
The claim that they can't publish the
pharma data is bogus. The state pharmacy board has the raw data and the Pioneer Planet has done the public a service by making it searchable, please see:
http://extra.twincities.com/car/doctors/default.asp
(Payments to Minnesota doctors and other caregivers)
Punch in Schulz
Then hit the links to Schulz, Sellman - the line with $462,811 is especially interesting.
The pitiful lengths to which the U has gone to avoid disclosure and the foot dragging is ludicrous.
Mr. Rotenberg, still think you have a problem with State law or want to make that argument? Then draft something and get it over to the legislature to fix the problem. I'm sure they'd be only too happy to help you. Seems that medical schools all over the country can accomplish this. Why not us?
(I am not holding my breath, because I'm still waiting for you to deal with the double dippers...)
Ugg Mayfaire Boots On Sale
Ugg Mayfaire Boots On Sale Buy Cheap Ugg knightsbridge boots,Ugg Bailey Button boots,more 2009 new uggs arrival at Softugg.Inc for you!Free shipping and nontax,Save you 50% OFF!
Classic Tall Ugg Boots on sale!,We are professional supply Ugg bailey button Classic Short Ugg Boots is your best choice,free shipping and nontax,only need 1 week to your door!