University of Minnesota-Twin Cities

Search
Search
News
Multimedia
Sports
Classifieds
Opinion
Subscribe
Entertainment
Send a Tip
Podcasts
Donate
In-Depth
Corrections

Subscribeto our newsletter

Minnesota Daily Logo

Thursday, December 12, 2019 Print Edition

Donate

  • News
  • Sports
  • Opinion
  • Entertainment
  • In-Depth
  • Multimedia
  • Podcasts
  • Classifieds
  • Special Issues
  • Corrections
  • Send a Tip
  • News
  • Sports
  • Opinion
  • Entertainment
  • In-Depth
  • Multimedia
  • Podcasts
  • Classifieds
  • Special Issues
  • Corrections
  • Send a Tip
Search

Subscribe

The independent news source for the University of Minnesota campus, now only a click away. Subscribe to the Minnesota Daily's e-newsletter for full sports coverage, updates from the newsroom, and a pick of the week's top features.

Minnesota Daily Newsletter

Fill out my online form.

Donate to the Minnesota Daily!

The Minnesota Daily has been training student journalists and serving the University of Minnesota community since 1900. With your help, we will continue to produce award-winning journalism and provide excellent training for students in all areas of news production. We collect donations through GiveMN; please click below and donate today!

MINNESOTA DAILY | GiveMN


11/6/2019, 11:36am

Liberal education redesign process continues with several public forums

The forums were intended to gather feedback from faculty and academic advisers on the proposed changes to the University's liberal education requirements, which will be discussed at the upcoming University Senate meeting.

By Niamh Coomey
Liberal education redesign process continues with several public forums
Mrunal Zambre
Professor Sally Gregory Kohlstedt, chair of the LE Redesign Committee, speaks with faculty during a forum in the Northstar Ballroom at the St. Paul Student Center on Thursday, Oct. 31. Faculty from various departments offered feedback on proposed changes to liberal education requirements.

Share

  • Share
  • Tweet
  • Mail
  • Print

Looking to gather feedback on potential changes to liberal education requirements, a UMN committee has hosted public forums over the past two weeks for faculty and academic advisers.

The Liberal Education Redesign Committee has been meeting over the past two years to rethink the current requirements, a set of classes which students must complete before graduation. The committee hosted three forums, two for faculty and one for academic advisers, to prompt discussion on new, proposed models for the requirements. 

At the forums, faculty and advisers shared their perspectives on the proposed models and how they may impact students.The models will be the main topic of discussion at the upcoming University Senate meeting on Thursday. 

The committee drafted plans A, B and C, which were published earlier this year. In response, discontented faculty drafted plan D.

Plan D requires that students take one class in each thematic area: Diversity, Power and Justice in the U.S., Global Perspectives, Technology and Social Transformations, and Environment and Sustainability, while plan A asks that students take two out of the four themes.

Previously considered plans B and C have been taken off the table. This leaves plans A and D as the main models up for discussion. 

Both plans have adopted "ethics" and "quantitative reasoning and mathematics" as requirements.

One of the main points of discussion at the forums was whether courses that “double dip,” those that are double certified by fulfilling two requirements, should be eliminated, as suggested in plan A. This change would increase the number of required courses for students.

Mahesh Mahanthappa, a professor in the Department of Chemical Engineering and Material Science, said this could be harmful for diversity in the student body.

“More requirements put more financial stress on students and that certainly is not going to help our students who are not coming from … well-off backgrounds,” he added.

Mahanthappa said double certified courses are valuable because, in his experience, innovation comes from making connections between different disciplines.

Claire Hilgeman, senior academic adviser in the College of Liberal Arts, said the redesign process has shed light on topics that are peripheral to the requirements, such as the liberal education course certification process. 

Joseph Farag, a professor in the Asian and Middle Eastern Studies Department, said the proposed changes, which would ask faculty ‘learning communities’ to review syllabi and discuss thematic course certifications together, would be an improvement.

Faculty in his department and others have felt discouraged from taking the time to propose courses that meet thematic criteria because they often do not get approved, he said. 

Daniel Gallaher, a professor in the Department of Food Science and Nutrition, said he is pleased to see the ethics fundamental present in the proposed plans A and D. This was previously not a required topic for students. 

Vice Provost and Dean of Undergraduate Education Bob McMaster, who has overseen the redesign process, said the idea that drove the work in the committee was finding the best curriculum for students. 

“I’m convinced that either plan A or plan D will provide the students with a terrific undergraduate core curriculum,” he said.

Maintaining the current curriculum was also discussed as an option at the forums.

“Why change something that isn’t compelling?” Hilgeman said. “If they got it right 11 years ago, they got it right 11 years ago.”

Share



Related Stories

Illustrated by Morgan La Casse

Faculty weigh in on changes to UMN liberal education requirements

By Niamh Coomey

Illustrated by Morgan La Casse

UMN unveils remodeled lib ed draft plan

By Dylan Anderson

Illustrated by Morgan La Casse

UMN looks to revamp long-standing lib ed requirements

By Austen Macalus


The Minnesota Daily welcomes thoughtful discussion on all of our stories, but please keep comments civil and on-topic. Read our full guidelines here.


Editor's Picks


Last Updated 16 hours ago

For many, federal protections for those with disabilities are not enough

By Hana Ikramuddin

ADA requirements may not be enough to ensure accessibility to those on campus that need it, advocates say.


Last Updated 18 hours ago

A step to rebuild relationships: U hires director of tribal relations


Last Updated 19 hours ago

Proposed increase in visa application fee could impact UMN students


Last Updated 19 hours ago

After high-rise fire, Cedar-Riverside begins to heal


Podcasts


Last Updated 16 hours ago

Episode 45: In a step to rebuild relationships, U hires director of tribal relations


12/5/2019, 8:11pm

Episode 13: Wrapping up football, Gophers head into basketball season


12/5/2019, 12:34am

Episode 44: Welcome to the star gazing party


Minnesota Daily Logo To Homepage
  • About
  • Jobs
  • Freelance
  • Contact
  • Archives
  • Advertise
  • Content Diversity
  • Ethics & Policies
  • Distribution

All Rights Reserved

© Copyright 2019 Minnesota Daily

Powered by Solutions by The State News.